Re: [Flightgear-devel] OS-X binaries for 0.9.3-pre1

2003-10-16 Thread Tim Kober
Hi James, I know Darrel Wassiler (who's probably lurking here somewhere) has already done similar work, but for my own amusement, I've been working on getting SimGear and FlightGear compiled as a framework (in the case of SimGear) and a bundle (in the case of FlightGear). This translates as

Re: [Flightgear-devel] OS-X binaries for 0.9.3-pre1

2003-10-16 Thread Erik Hofman
James Turner wrote: As a sidenote to all FG developers, it would be great if any part of the base package that normal users might want to expand can handle multiple paths : then I can locate the main base package, which is essentially static for a given release, inside the the application

Re: [Flightgear-devel] OS-X binaries for 0.9.3-pre1

2003-10-16 Thread James Turner
On Thursday, October 16, 2003, at 09:55 am, Erik Hofman wrote: As a sidenote to all FG developers, it would be great if any part of the base package that normal users might want to expand can handle multiple paths : then I can locate the main base package, which is essentially static for a