Re: [Flightgear-devel] Teaser Screenshot

2004-05-24 Thread Durk Talsma
On Monday 24 May 2004 01:58, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
 Why does the MD-11 look so big?

 Regards,
 Ampere


Oh, that's just a matter of exagerrated perspective, stemming from using a 
very wide angle lense. The MD11 is slightly closer to the camera and 
therefor looks relatively large. I tried a different angle before, where it 
was facing away from the camera, and then it looked very tiny. 

Cheers,
Durk


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Teaser Screenshot

2004-05-23 Thread Wolfram Kuss
Hi Durk!

Great to hear of progress in this important area!

Bye bye,
Wolfram.


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Teaser Screenshot

2004-05-23 Thread Ampere K. Hardraade
Why does the MD-11 look so big?

Regards,
Ampere

On May 21, 2004 10:59 am, Durk Talsma wrote:
 Hey Folks,

 Looks like I'm getting somewhere now with the traffic manager, so I thought
 it's time for a screenshot. :-)

 http://members.chello.nl/d.talsma/two-heavies.jpg

 What you see is an MD-11, which at 8:25AM, UTC mysteriously materializes at
 the threshold of runway 24 at EHAM airport. The model is displayed and
 controlled using David Culp's AIManager.

 There's still a long way to go before we have a fully developed AI system,
 and I actually had to tak a few shortcuts to get make this screen shot
 possible, but still...

 Hope ya like it!
 Durk


 ___
 Flightgear-devel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel