Re: [Flightgear-devel] Tile sizes (was Re: SGBucket::sgBucketDiff fix)

2005-05-04 Thread Erik Hofman
Curtis L. Olson wrote: So my question is this ... what would people think of perhaps doubling the equatorial tile width, and then keeping the width of all tiles fixed to the same value at all latitudes. One *huge* bug that would be fixed is that we would eliminate the unsightly cracks at the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Tile sizes (was Re: SGBucket::sgBucketDiff fix)

2005-05-04 Thread Roman Grigoriev
- Original Message - From: Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FlightGear developers discussions flightgear-devel@flightgear.org Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 12:59 AM Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Tile sizes (was Re: SGBucket::sgBucketDiff fix) Curtis L. Olson wrote: So my

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Tile sizes (was Re: SGBucket::sgBucketDiff fix)

2005-05-04 Thread Erik Hofman
Roman Grigoriev wrote: Also I think we should use LOD shemes for tiles - it's easy to implement and we can use visibility up to 64 km w/o performance penalty. What approach would you suggest, a textured (incl. a normal map texture) quad, a simplified and textured tile or something different?

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Tile sizes (was Re: SGBucket::sgBucketDiff fix)

2005-05-04 Thread Roman Grigoriev
- Original Message - From: Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FlightGear developers discussions flightgear-devel@flightgear.org Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 3:51 AM Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Tile sizes (was Re: SGBucket::sgBucketDiff fix) Roman Grigoriev wrote: Also I think

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Tile sizes (was Re: SGBucket::sgBucketDiff fix)

2005-05-04 Thread Arnt Karlsen
sizes (was Re: SGBucket::sgBucketDiff fix) Roman Grigoriev wrote: Also I think we should use LOD shemes for tiles - it's easy to implement and we can use visibility up to 64 km w/o performance penalty. What approach would you suggest, a textured (incl. a normal map texture