Re: [Flightgear-devel] [ANN] fgcom VoIP-package version 1.0

2007-09-17 Thread Holger Wirtz
Hi, On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:11:36PM +0200, AnMaster wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 None of the deps seems to exist on gentoo. I can't find these in portage at all: asterix, libiaxclient, axclient (or under any other name I can think of) libgsm1 portaudio is is

[Flightgear-devel] And again: VATSIM and FG?

2007-09-17 Thread Holger Wirtz
Hi, yes, I know: this is discussed again and again and ... I wrote the VATSIM developers an email and described the functionality of FGCOM. They answered that they will have this in mind but currently they will keep their own VVL (VATSIM Voice Library). But they asked me if I want to write

Re: [Flightgear-devel] And again: VATSIM and FG?

2007-09-17 Thread Ralf Gerlich
Hi! I have worked previously on a KDE port of the ProController client (now replaced by ASRC) and maybe I'm a bit bitter about my experience at that time. Therefore I'm not trying to give answers here, but just ask some - possibly suggestive ;-) - questions. Holger Wirtz wrote: But they asked

[Flightgear-devel] flashing AIModel aircraft

2007-09-17 Thread kennorris9
A short background; I have an external FDM that provide up to 6 aircraft that I want to display. I tried several approaches using the multiplayer port and AI code but the aircraft were not position stable, i.e. they moved around in 3d space. To correct for this I tried to re-write the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] And again: VATSIM and FG?

2007-09-17 Thread Curtis Olson
On 9/17/07, Ralf Gerlich wrote: Holger Wirtz wrote: But they asked me if I want to write something like a VATSIM-proxy for FG to get arround the GPL problem. This proxy has to be closed-source. Hrm, so they are interested in getting FlightGear users into the boat, but they are not willing

Re: [Flightgear-devel] And again: VATSIM and FG?

2007-09-17 Thread John Wojnaroski
Jon Stockill wrote: Curtis Olson wrote: 2. In terms of who does the interfacing work, us or them. I think that boils down to who benefits. I suspect that the FlightGear users will have a bigger benefit from getting access to the vatsim world than visa versa. Based on what I've seen on

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Linux in real-world aviation (was: FG and VATSIM)

2007-09-17 Thread Robin
Curtis Olson wrote: 3. I'll just toss in this unrelated item ... a week ago I got to fly on a NWA A330. This aircraft had individual movie/music/game/map displays for each seat. I managed to hang/lock mine up ... apparently because the map wasn't working on this flight for some reason.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Linux in real-world aviation (was: FG and VATSIM)

2007-09-17 Thread Curtis Olson
On 9/17/07, Robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Linux isn't FAA certified so it's not used for mission-critical systems but in-flight entertainment systems would be very useful on Linux. Yup and if they are running it on a couple hundred seats, individually, there would be no need to pay the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] And again: VATSIM and FG?

2007-09-17 Thread leee
On Monday 17 September 2007 17:30, Ralf Gerlich wrote: Hi, Jon Stockill wrote: This needs to take into account the platforms that flightgear is used on. If it's closed source then ideally whoever produces the app is going to need the capability to build (at the very minimum) linux, mac,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] And again: VATSIM and FG?

2007-09-17 Thread Jon Stockill
Curtis Olson wrote: 2. In terms of who does the interfacing work, us or them. I think that boils down to who benefits. I suspect that the FlightGear users will have a bigger benefit from getting access to the vatsim world than visa versa. Based on what I've seen on the multiplayer

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Linux in real-world aviation

2007-09-17 Thread Robin
Ralf Gerlich wrote: I don't know whether this should be termed a good thing. Or why should Linux-advocates be proud of their operating system being seen rebooting on two independent instances? ;-) Cheers, Ralf They would be more concerned about what was happening BEFORE the reboot. The

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Linux in real-world aviation

2007-09-17 Thread Curtis Olson
On 9/17/07, Robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ralf Gerlich wrote: I don't know whether this should be termed a good thing. Or why should Linux-advocates be proud of their operating system being seen rebooting on two independent instances? ;-) They would be more concerned about what was

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Linux in real-world aviation (was: FG and VATSIM)

2007-09-17 Thread Durk Talsma
On Monday 17 September 2007 18:41, Curtis Olson wrote: My best guess is a debian derivative, probably stripped down for this specific application. I saw the debian penguin come up at the head of the console boot messages ... only one penguin so it looks like a single processor. I don't know

Re: [Flightgear-devel] And again: VATSIM and FG?

2007-09-17 Thread Ralf Gerlich
Hi, Jon Stockill wrote: This needs to take into account the platforms that flightgear is used on. If it's closed source then ideally whoever produces the app is going to need the capability to build (at the very minimum) linux, mac, and windows binaries, since handing the source over to

[Flightgear-devel] FSWeekend 2007

2007-09-17 Thread Durk Talsma
This is just a quick note to remind everybody that FlightGear is intending to have a booth at the Dutch FlightSim event FSWeekend, organized November 3 4 at the aviodrome in Lelystad. As it looks right now, Martin Spott and I will be organizing the booth, and we are currently still looking

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Movie Special Effects Request from Aerotro

2007-09-17 Thread Forums Virgin Net
F.A.O. Robin van Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dear Robin, Thanks that is very kind of you, primarily at the moment I am trying to make the movies rely more or less on what flightgear has to offer in it's software based code. To many external special

Re: [Flightgear-devel] And again: VATSIM and FG?

2007-09-17 Thread Holger Wirtz
Hi *, On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 10:52:55AM -0500, Curtis Olson wrote: On 9/17/07, Ralf Gerlich wrote: Holger Wirtz wrote: But they asked me if I want to write something like a VATSIM-proxy for FG to get arround the GPL problem. This proxy has to be closed-source. Hrm, so they are