Hi Tat,
- Tatsuhiro Nishioka [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Anyway, could someone apply his (and my) patches and commit to cvs?
RCS file: /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/source/src/Main/fg_init.cxx,v
retrieving revision 1.201
diff -u -r1.201 fg_init.cxx
1.201 is a bit old.
jean pellotier wrote
we did a scenario that use the carrier type to make an arresting cable
with a flols working, at LFRJ airport (Landivisiau, France), but if we
check the turn to wind button the cable and the flols are moving,
considered like a normal carrier.
Is there a way to make it
I wrote
jean pellotier wrote
we did a scenario that use the carrier type to make an arresting cable
with a flols working, at LFRJ airport (Landivisiau, France), but if we
check the turn to wind button the cable and the flols are moving,
considered like a normal carrier.
Is there a
I wrote
jean pellotier wrote
we did a scenario that use the carrier type to make an arresting cable
with a flols working, at LFRJ airport (Landivisiau, France), but if we
check the turn to wind button the cable and the flols are moving,
considered like a normal carrier.
Is
Vivian Meazza a écrit :
OK - Wave Off Lights 71, 72 were in the wrong position, as were 61, 62,
which confused me. Fixed now in cvs - please check that the problem is
solved for you.
now 71 and 72 are in the right place, but 61 and 62 are in the same
place as 51 and 52, so there's
To continue this discussion a bit (please add your comments) James an I
had a short discussion about using std::string (for example) everywhere
in the file or using using std::string; at the beginning. James
pointed out that the suing std:: statement in header files might not be
a good idea,
On 30 Jul 2008, at 11:29, Erik Hofman wrote:
To continue this discussion a bit (please add your comments) James
an I
had a short discussion about using std::string (for example)
everywhere
in the file or using using std::string; at the beginning. James
pointed out that the suing std::
* Erik Hofman -- Wednesday 30 July 2008:
To continue this discussion a bit (please add your comments) James an I
had a short discussion about using std::string (for example) everywhere
in the file or using using std::string; at the beginning.
I think this shouldn't be a policy question at
jean pellotier wrote
Vivian Meazza a écrit :
OK - Wave Off Lights 71, 72 were in the wrong position, as were 61, 62,
which confused me. Fixed now in cvs - please check that the problem is
solved for you.
now 71 and 72 are in the right place, but 61 and 62 are in the same
place
Vivian Meazza a écrit :
So they are - fixed in cvs (I hope) - try again
that's ok for me, thanks.
jano
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Erik Hofman -- Wednesday 30 July 2008:
To continue this discussion a bit (please add your comments) James an I
had a short discussion about using std::string (for example) everywhere
in the file or using using std::string; at the beginning.
I think this shouldn't
jean pellotier wrote
Vivian Meazza a écrit :
So they are - fixed in cvs (I hope) - try again
that's ok for me, thanks.
Glad that we've fixed that - it must have been that way for several years.
But what is the real issue with the demo? I couldn't get it to work here -
doesn't it need
* Erik Hofman -- Wednesday 30 July 2008:
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Erik Hofman -- Wednesday 30 July 2008:
IOW: Leave it to the developer.
Well I got some patches from James that turned 'using std::'
into std::, hence the question.
Yes, I undestood the situation and the question perfectly
On 30 Jul 2008, at 13:23, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
Actually, I think that putting std:: at every reference is
not preferable, as in 99% of the cases we mean std::string,
and in 100% we mean std::cout, so the prefix is basically
redundant noise. Do we actually have more than one or two
cases
James Turner wrote:
I think this is a good example of why 'using std::xxx' is potentially
problematic in headers (especially public library headers, i.e
Simgear), but fine in sources. So if I'm doing future cleanups, that's
the approach I'd take - remove 'using' from headers, and add it
* Melchior FRANZ -- Wednesday 30 July 2008:
Yes, I undestood the situation and the question perfectly well.
Argh, no, I didn't. I missed the headers part. Of course I
agree on that -- that's evil. Sorry for the redundant noise
then. ;-)
m.
Hi Fred,
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Frederic Bouvier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Tat,
- Tatsuhiro Nishioka [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Anyway, could someone apply his (and my) patches and commit to cvs?
RCS file: /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/source/src/Main/fg_init.cxx,v
retrieving
Vivian Meazza a écrit :
Glad that we've fixed that - it must have been that way for several years.
But what is the real issue with the demo? I couldn't get it to work here -
doesn't it need the model as well?
oh sorry, i didn't gave you all needed to do it working, here's what's
18 matches
Mail list logo
