Re: [Flightgear-devel] Mac #ifdef clean-ups

2008-07-30 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Hi Tat, - Tatsuhiro Nishioka [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Anyway, could someone apply his (and my) patches and commit to cvs? RCS file: /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/source/src/Main/fg_init.cxx,v retrieving revision 1.201 diff -u -r1.201 fg_init.cxx 1.201 is a bit old.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] about the carrier used in scenario

2008-07-30 Thread Vivian Meazza
jean pellotier wrote we did a scenario that use the carrier type to make an arresting cable with a flols working, at LFRJ airport (Landivisiau, France), but if we check the turn to wind button the cable and the flols are moving, considered like a normal carrier. Is there a way to make it

Re: [Flightgear-devel] about the carrier used in scenario

2008-07-30 Thread Vivian Meazza
I wrote jean pellotier wrote we did a scenario that use the carrier type to make an arresting cable with a flols working, at LFRJ airport (Landivisiau, France), but if we check the turn to wind button the cable and the flols are moving, considered like a normal carrier. Is there a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] about the carrier used in scenario

2008-07-30 Thread Vivian Meazza
I wrote jean pellotier wrote we did a scenario that use the carrier type to make an arresting cable with a flols working, at LFRJ airport (Landivisiau, France), but if we check the turn to wind button the cable and the flols are moving, considered like a normal carrier. Is

Re: [Flightgear-devel] about the carrier used in scenario

2008-07-30 Thread jean pellotier
Vivian Meazza a écrit : OK - Wave Off Lights 71, 72 were in the wrong position, as were 61, 62, which confused me. Fixed now in cvs - please check that the problem is solved for you. now 71 and 72 are in the right place, but 61 and 62 are in the same place as 51 and 52, so there's

[Flightgear-devel] using std::

2008-07-30 Thread Erik Hofman
To continue this discussion a bit (please add your comments) James an I had a short discussion about using std::string (for example) everywhere in the file or using using std::string; at the beginning. James pointed out that the suing std:: statement in header files might not be a good idea,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] using std::

2008-07-30 Thread James Turner
On 30 Jul 2008, at 11:29, Erik Hofman wrote: To continue this discussion a bit (please add your comments) James an I had a short discussion about using std::string (for example) everywhere in the file or using using std::string; at the beginning. James pointed out that the suing std::

Re: [Flightgear-devel] using std::

2008-07-30 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Erik Hofman -- Wednesday 30 July 2008: To continue this discussion a bit (please add your comments) James an I had a short discussion about using std::string (for example) everywhere in the file or using using std::string; at the beginning. I think this shouldn't be a policy question at

Re: [Flightgear-devel] about the carrier used in scenario

2008-07-30 Thread Vivian Meazza
jean pellotier wrote Vivian Meazza a écrit : OK - Wave Off Lights 71, 72 were in the wrong position, as were 61, 62, which confused me. Fixed now in cvs - please check that the problem is solved for you. now 71 and 72 are in the right place, but 61 and 62 are in the same place

Re: [Flightgear-devel] about the carrier used in scenario

2008-07-30 Thread jean pellotier
Vivian Meazza a écrit : So they are - fixed in cvs (I hope) - try again that's ok for me, thanks. jano - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based

Re: [Flightgear-devel] using std::

2008-07-30 Thread Erik Hofman
Melchior FRANZ wrote: * Erik Hofman -- Wednesday 30 July 2008: To continue this discussion a bit (please add your comments) James an I had a short discussion about using std::string (for example) everywhere in the file or using using std::string; at the beginning. I think this shouldn't

Re: [Flightgear-devel] about the carrier used in scenario

2008-07-30 Thread Vivian Meazza
jean pellotier wrote Vivian Meazza a écrit : So they are - fixed in cvs (I hope) - try again that's ok for me, thanks. Glad that we've fixed that - it must have been that way for several years. But what is the real issue with the demo? I couldn't get it to work here - doesn't it need

Re: [Flightgear-devel] using std::

2008-07-30 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Erik Hofman -- Wednesday 30 July 2008: Melchior FRANZ wrote: * Erik Hofman -- Wednesday 30 July 2008: IOW: Leave it to the developer. Well I got some patches from James that turned 'using std::' into std::, hence the question. Yes, I undestood the situation and the question perfectly

Re: [Flightgear-devel] using std::

2008-07-30 Thread James Turner
On 30 Jul 2008, at 13:23, Melchior FRANZ wrote: Actually, I think that putting std:: at every reference is not preferable, as in 99% of the cases we mean std::string, and in 100% we mean std::cout, so the prefix is basically redundant noise. Do we actually have more than one or two cases

Re: [Flightgear-devel] using std::

2008-07-30 Thread Erik Hofman
James Turner wrote: I think this is a good example of why 'using std::xxx' is potentially problematic in headers (especially public library headers, i.e Simgear), but fine in sources. So if I'm doing future cleanups, that's the approach I'd take - remove 'using' from headers, and add it

Re: [Flightgear-devel] using std::

2008-07-30 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Melchior FRANZ -- Wednesday 30 July 2008: Yes, I undestood the situation and the question perfectly well. Argh, no, I didn't. I missed the headers part. Of course I agree on that -- that's evil. Sorry for the redundant noise then. ;-) m.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Mac #ifdef clean-ups

2008-07-30 Thread Tatsuhiro Nishioka
Hi Fred, On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Frederic Bouvier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Tat, - Tatsuhiro Nishioka [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Anyway, could someone apply his (and my) patches and commit to cvs? RCS file: /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/source/src/Main/fg_init.cxx,v retrieving

Re: [Flightgear-devel] about the carrier used in scenario

2008-07-30 Thread jean pellotier
Vivian Meazza a écrit : Glad that we've fixed that - it must have been that way for several years. But what is the real issue with the demo? I couldn't get it to work here - doesn't it need the model as well? oh sorry, i didn't gave you all needed to do it working, here's what's