Erik Hofman wrote:
James Turner wrote:
I think this is a good example of why 'using std::xxx' is potentially
problematic in headers (especially public library headers, i.e
Simgear), but fine in sources. So if I'm doing future cleanups, that's
the approach I'd take - remove 'using'
Tim Moore wrote:
To add my two cents:
I mostly favor putting using declarations at the top of source files
instead
of using namespace qualifiers in the code. On the other hand, I would
probably
use the namespace qualifer explicitly if the symbol in question is somewhat
obscure, to give
Hi Greg,
On Monday 28 July 2008 17:13, Greg Hawkes wrote:
My biggest problem with FlightGear's AI traffic is not the complexity of
the XML files, nor the need to assign individual aircraft to flights
(although anything that reduces that complexity is good). Instead, the
biggest issue that I
On Sunday 27 July 2008 11:50, Durk Talsma wrote:
I'm cross posting this message to both flightgear-devel and
flightgear-users, because I know there are quite a few flightgear-users
subscribers working on developing traffic plans. I will certainly take a
few more weeks (maybe even a few
i noticed that on the f16 the speedbrakes have no effect at all and i
managed to track it down to the fact that the various coefficients use
fcs/mag-speedbrake-pos-rad on input which never gets set anywhere (so
it is always 0).
digging through the cvs logs i found that in version 1.17 of f16.xml
5 matches
Mail list logo
