* James Turner -- 8/20/2008 1:44 PM:
But, doing this, I wondered - there's these displaced threshold and
stopway values in Robin's data, which we are parsing, storing in
memory, and which are never used by any C++ code - they do get passed
to Nasal, but I'd bet some money no one on that
On 25 Aug 2008, at 07:31, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
I just made all internal runway data available in the Nasal query
function, without considering any possible use case. So far I only
used those elements that I needed for finding the touchdown point
($FG_ROOT/Nasal/glide_slope_tunnel.nas).
On 25 Aug 2008, at 03:25, Curtis Olson wrote:
Hi James,
I think this was all done intentionally because it's quite common to
want to start a flight simulator on a 5 or 7 or 10 mile approach so
you can practice ILS landing.
The start-offset-m value I believe was added later to account
Hello,
...
In order to get these data into the JSB FDM, the crude solution could
be, to
include the yasim calculation part into JSBSim.
I feel that won't be the more elegant solution, and i am not sure that
Jon
would agree on it. :)
Though, i am not aware, about the FG source
Hi,
Just a quick note:
Today I found another OpenSource FlightSim which uses OSG. It is under
GPL-licence, and has as features like:
Carrier landing mission.
Motion blur (-motion-blur).
Sky dome.
Sound effects (PLIB)
Particle-system (improved explosions).
Collision-detection.
Can download
On 08/24/2008 01:53 PM, James Turner wrote:
Doing this, I came across something which seems counter-intuitive to me:
I agree, it's counterintuitive, to say the least.
default azimuth to offset by is the *reciprocal* runway heading. This
means to start 10nm 'out' from the threshold, one can
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 3:12 AM, James Turner wrote:
On 25 Aug 2008, at 03:25, Curtis Olson wrote:
Hi James,
I think this was all done intentionally because it's quite common to
want to start a flight simulator on a 5 or 7 or 10 mile approach so
you can practice ILS landing.
The
On lun 25 août 2008, Jon S. Berndt wrote:
Hi Gerard,
I think the ultimate solution would be for FlightGear to move this code
out of the FDM's and into the FDM interface class.
Dave
I firmly agree: determining carrier location and orientation should not be
an FDM specific function.
On 08/25/2008 02:45 PM, Curtis Olson wrote:
Can you further explain what the bug involves? In my experience, placing
the aircraft on the glide slope several miles out and flying the glide slope
all works fine, or am I missing something here?
In my experience, the glideslope initialization
Hmmm, ok I suppose that is possible. I have done this with an external FAA
certified flight dynamics model, but I am letting the flightgear code
compute the final longitude and latitude and altitude and just passing that
over. This has worked as recently as 2 weeks ago. I don't know that I've
Hello, My name is Gonzalo Rubio, i`m a studing Aeronautics Engineering at the
National University of Cordoba (UNC) in Argentina.
We are developing a project in wich we will use Flight Gear with JSBsim as the
equations solver for simulating an airplane that was developed and design on
the
11 matches
Mail list logo
