Re: [Flightgear-devel] proposed small change to navradio.cxx

2009-11-11 Thread James Turner
On 11 Nov 2009, at 00:49, syd adams wrote: Sounds good to me , but I admit I've been avoiding updating until I know what's happening to the nav system :) Somewhat confused by this - are you waiting for it to be 'done'? (Which is not the nature of open-source development...) Equally, I'm

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/src/Main viewmgr.cxx, 1.42, 1.43 viewmgr.hxx, 1.19, 1.20

2009-11-11 Thread Erik Hofman
Csaba Halász wrote: On 5 Nov 2009, at 09:18, Erik Hofman wrote: John Denker: Add a view debugging functions and represent the viewer quats in the property tree for debugging. Unfortunately the debug code is broken and causes segfaults. It is tieing temporary char pointers to property

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/src/Main viewmgr.cxx, 1.45, 1.46

2009-11-11 Thread Martin Spott
Hi Erik, Erik Hofman wrote: Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/source/src/Main In directory baron.flightgear.org:/tmp/cvs-serv10148 Modified Files: viewmgr.cxx Log Message: put the debugging quat strings as doubles under /sim/current-view/debug instead. I suspect that

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/src/Main viewmgr.cxx, 1.45, 1.46

2009-11-11 Thread Erik Hofman
Martin Spott wrote: Hi Erik, Erik Hofman wrote: Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/source/src/Main In directory baron.flightgear.org:/tmp/cvs-serv10148 Modified Files: viewmgr.cxx Log Message: put the debugging quat strings as doubles under /sim/current-view/debug instead. I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/src/Main viewmgr.cxx, 1.42, 1.43 viewmgr.hxx, 1.19, 1.20

2009-11-11 Thread John Denker
On 11/10/2009 06:36 PM, Csaba Halász wrote: On 5 Nov 2009, at 09:18, Erik Hofman wrote: John Denker: Add a view debugging functions and represent the viewer quats in the property tree for debugging. Unfortunately the debug code is broken and causes segfaults. It is tieing temporary char

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/src/Main viewmgr.cxx, 1.42, 1.43 viewmgr.hxx, 1.19, 1.20

2009-11-11 Thread Csaba Halász
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:43 PM, John Denker j...@av8n.com wrote: Before switching to the string representation, I read the code for the tie functions.  I got the impression the code was making a clone, i.e. a deep copy.  Apparently this impression was incorrect.  Sorry. No, the problem

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/src/Main viewmgr.cxx, 1.42, 1.43 viewmgr.hxx, 1.19, 1.20

2009-11-11 Thread Erik Hofman
John Denker wrote: Having used the feature both ways, I remain of the opinion that the string representation is easier for the user to interpret. Doing this safely via a few static char*s is easy to do. Let me work on it. To be honest I don't think it's worth the effort, but I wont hold you

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/src/Main

2009-11-11 Thread Martin Spott
Erik Hofman wrote: Martin Spott wrote: Hi Erik, Erik Hofman wrote: Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/source/src/Main In directory baron.flightgear.org:/tmp/cvs-serv10148 Modified Files: viewmgr.cxx Log Message: put the debugging quat strings as doubles under

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/src/Main viewmgr.cxx, 1.42, 1.43 viewmgr.hxx, 1.19, 1.20

2009-11-11 Thread John Denker
On 11/11/2009 07:10 AM, Erik Hofman wrote: John Denker wrote: Having used the feature both ways, I remain of the opinion that the string representation is easier for the user to interpret. Doing this safely via a few static char*s is easy to do. Let me work on it. To be honest I don't

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Prime Meridian Crash

2009-11-11 Thread Pete Morgan
Dont know if this helps. but I compiled SG and FG with and without the CXXFLAGS. It only crashes when CXXFLAGS are NOT on FG, which seems to indicate a FG problem. Also noted is that the crash seems to happen 9 times out of ten to the west of prime, no matter how its approached. Is there

[Flightgear-devel] error: no matching function for call to ‘FGFX::set_velocity(SGVec3d) ’

2009-11-11 Thread John Denker
The current next branch won't compile chez moi. make[2]: Entering directory `.../fgs/src/Model' g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../src/Include -I../.. -I../../src -I/games/orig/usr/include -I/usr/local/include -Wl,-rpath=/games/orig/usr/lib64 -I/games/orig/usr -D_REENTRANT -MT acmodel.o -MD -MP

Re: [Flightgear-devel] error: no matching function for call to ‘FGFX::set_velocity(SGVec3d) ’

2009-11-11 Thread Tim Moore
On 11/11/2009 08:24 PM, John Denker wrote: The current next branch won't compile chez moi. make[2]: Entering directory `.../fgs/src/Model' g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../src/Include -I../.. -I../../src -I/games/orig/usr/include -I/usr/local/include -Wl,-rpath=/games/orig/usr/lib64

Re: [Flightgear-devel] festival ... or not

2009-11-11 Thread Stuart Buchanan
Hi Guys, John Denker wrote in part: On 11/09/2009 02:37 PM, Anders Gidenstam wrote in part: 2. I don't remeber if I had to touch the festival config or not, but here it is: and...@sleipner:/etc$ cat /etc/festival.scm (Parameter.set 'Audio_Command aplay -D plug:dmix -q -c 1 -t raw -f

Re: [Flightgear-devel] error: no matching function for call to ‘FGFX::set_velocity(SGVec3d) ’

2009-11-11 Thread John Denker
On 11/11/2009 03:00 PM, Tim Moore wrote: Try it again. My pushes to the flightgear and simgear repos got a bit out of sync. All better now. Thanks. -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Access flight data with an external application in realtime.

2009-11-11 Thread Pop !!! Y2k
I've done this but using the telnet option of Flightgear. Works fine Leidson PlanetaMessenger.org 2009/11/4 Ørjan Pettersen orj...@stud.cs.uit.no Curtis Olson wrote: 2009/10/31 Ørjan Pettersen orj...@stud.cs.uit.no mailto:orj...@stud.cs.uit.no Hello! I was planning on

Re: [Flightgear-devel] festival ... or not

2009-11-11 Thread John Denker
On 11/11/2009 03:49 PM, Stuart Buchanan wrote: I may be missing something, but I haven't had any problems getting festival to work on Ubuntu, other than extracting the files in the correct place. I don't have a /etc/festival.scm file. Is this specific to some sound driver? I'm pretty

[Flightgear-devel] view quats one per line

2009-11-11 Thread John Denker
On 11/11/2009 07:10 AM, Erik Hofman wrote: John Denker wrote: Having used the feature both ways, I remain of the opinion that the string representation is easier for the user to interpret. Doing this safely via a few static char*s is easy to do. Let me work on it. To be honest I don't

[Flightgear-devel] Clouds

2009-11-11 Thread Pete Morgan
Can the enable 3d clouds Menu View Rendering options 3D Coluds also appear under Menu Enviroment Clouds if possible Pete -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Quats from (lat,lon) to (0,0)

2009-11-11 Thread Jon S. Berndt
Here's how I would do the celestial mechanics: This is simplest in the earth-centered nonrotating frame (ECN). Note: I couldn't find a decent reference defining the various reference frames, so I wrote one: http://www.av8n.com/physics/coords.htm It's still somewhat

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Clouds

2009-11-11 Thread syd adams
My vote is no to a second one , but moving it , possibly. There are many other changes I'd like to make , but need more feedback... On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Pete Morgan ac...@daffodil.uk.com wrote: Can the enable 3d clouds Menu View Rendering options 3D Coluds also appear under

[Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] recent segfaults caused by jsbsim and property tree

2009-11-11 Thread Csaba Halász
Hi Everybody! As you may know we have been recently investigating mysterious segfaults experienced with some jsbsim aircraft such as the f16 or the hansajet. I have identified the following problems: 1) SGPropertyNode::getNode apparently stops parsing after an index. For example, given

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Clouds

2009-11-11 Thread George Patterson
From a end-user perspective, at this point, I'd be vote No to moving and No to the duplicating it. The reason being is that the 3d Clouds option is rendering only and not a weather option. I'd expect similar cloud coverage for both 3d clouds or the older method. Moving the option would mean that

[Flightgear-devel] dubious code in options.cxx

2009-11-11 Thread John Denker
Hi Folks -- The following snippet of code caught my eye: // If the string is too large to fit on the screen, // then split it up in several pieces. while ( t_str.size() 47 ) { unsigned int m

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Jsbsim-devel] [PATCH] recent segfaults caused by jsbsim and property tree

2009-11-11 Thread Jon S. Berndt
Hi Everybody! As you may know we have been recently investigating mysterious segfaults experienced with some jsbsim aircraft such as the f16 or the hansajet. I have identified the following problems: 1) SGPropertyNode::getNode apparently stops parsing after an index. For example, given

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Clouds

2009-11-11 Thread Ron Jensen
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 15:35 +1100, George Patterson wrote: From a end-user perspective, at this point, I'd be vote No to moving and No to the duplicating it. The reason being is that the 3d Clouds option is rendering only and not a weather option. I'd expect similar cloud coverage for both

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] recent segfaults caused by jsbsim and property tree

2009-11-11 Thread Tim Moore
On 11/12/2009 04:19 AM, Csaba Halász wrote: Hi Everybody! As you may know we have been recently investigating mysterious segfaults experienced with some jsbsim aircraft such as the f16 or the hansajet. I have identified the following problems: 1) SGPropertyNode::getNode apparently stops

Re: [Flightgear-devel] festival ... or not

2009-11-11 Thread Vadym Kukhtin
I'm launch festival as $ aoss festival --server And I advise you to use HTS voices - they a really small, only few megs each, but its quality same as hundreds-Mb CMU voices... You can get it here http://hts.sp.nitech.ac.jp/?Download -- --- WBR, Vadym.