Re: [Flightgear-devel] PRE_OSG cvs BUG in VSI with code fix

2007-01-07 Thread gh.robin
On Sun 7 January 2007 18:42, Nick Warne wrote: You must first check it , because the existing code is working right with /Systems/static/pressure-inhg Well, on Linux at least with that line I got two 'systems' directories in the property tree - one called /Systems/ with one item, the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] PRE_OSG cvs BUG in VSI with code fix

2007-01-07 Thread gh.robin
On Sun 7 January 2007 19:09, Martin Spott wrote: gh.robin wrote: On Sun 7 January 2007 18:20, Martin Spott wrote: Nick Warne wrote: There is a typo in: src/Instrumentation/vertical_speed_indicator.cxx line 17: _static_pressure(node-getStringValue(static-pressure

Re: [Flightgear-devel] PRE_OSG cvs BUG in VSI with code fix

2007-01-07 Thread gh.robin
On Sun 7 January 2007 19:13, gh.robin wrote: On Sun 7 January 2007 19:09, Martin Spott wrote: gh.robin wrote: On Sun 7 January 2007 18:20, Martin Spott wrote: Nick Warne wrote: There is a typo in: src/Instrumentation/vertical_speed_indicator.cxx line 17

Re: [Flightgear-devel] PRE_OSG cvs BUG in VSI with code fix

2007-01-07 Thread gh.robin
On Sun 7 January 2007 19:40, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote: On Sunday 07 January 2007 19:25, gh.robin wrote: And if you don't trust me, when i say its working, look at this http://perso.orange.fr/GRTux/pressure-inhg.jpg Nick is right, /Systems/... _is_ a typo. The reason why it is working

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/src/AIModel AIAircraft.cxx, 1.59, 1.60 AIBase.cxx, 1.71, 1.72 AIBase.hxx, 1.59, 1.60 AIManager.cxx, 1.71, 1.72 AIMultiplayer.cxx, 1.13, 1.14 AIS

2007-01-13 Thread gh.robin
On Sat 13 January 2007 10:04, Durk Talsma wrote: Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/source/src/AIModel In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv7377/src/AIModel Modified Files: AIAircraft.cxx AIBase.cxx AIBase.hxx AIManager.cxx AIMultiplayer.cxx AIStatic.cxx Log Message: Maik Justus,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] kap140 bug+fix

2007-01-15 Thread gh.robin
On Sat 13 January 2007 15:58, Dave Perry wrote: On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 12:19 +, Martin Spott wrote: Joacim Persson wrote: Bug: AP won't do GS arm (and GS lock) when switching to APR mode from ROL mode. Fix: In the last lines of function apr_arm_from_rol change:

Re: [Flightgear-devel] kap140 bug+fix

2007-01-15 Thread gh.robin
On Mon 15 January 2007 23:32, Dave Perry wrote: Hello Dave, Could you tell me , which FG version have you ran to test it FG cvs PreOSG , FG cvs HEAD (one recent after 2006-december-26) , or FG stable 0.9.10 ? Because i have tested it with last cvs HEAD , to me, it does not

Re: [Flightgear-devel] kap140 bug+fix

2007-01-16 Thread gh.robin
On Tue 16 January 2007 00:49, Dave Perry wrote: On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 00:21 +0100, gh.robin wrote: My question was which FG version have you ran to test it FG cvs PreOSG , FG cvs HEAD (one recent after 2006-december-26) , or FG stable 0.9.10 ? I have the kap140 working

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Proposal: New external force capability for JSBSim

2007-01-17 Thread gh.robin
On Wed 17 January 2007 20:48, Berndt, Jon S wrote: Dave Culp and I have been discussing the catapult and hook scheme for a while. That discussion has actually gone farther than that specific case, to planning for a capability that is a general one, for applying external forces to a JSBSim

[Flightgear-devel] How to get Doc without PDF format ?

2007-01-18 Thread gh.robin
We have some huge file doc in .pdf format That format is very difficult to be read, directly on screen, only one Way, to print it. Why that format ? , why don't we have the html format ? How to translate that doc from .pdf to .html. Regards -- Gérard

Re: [Flightgear-devel] How to get Doc without PDF format ?

2007-01-18 Thread gh.robin
On Thu 18 January 2007 16:41, Martin Spott wrote: gh.robin wrote: We have some huge file doc in .pdf format That format is very difficult to be read, directly on screen, only one Way, to print it. What's the purpose? Typically PDF is an excellent choice for reading on the screen as well

Re: [Flightgear-devel] How to get Doc without PDF format ?

2007-01-18 Thread gh.robin
On Thu 18 January 2007 18:20, Joacim Persson wrote: On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, gh.robin wrote: Oh, yes you are right , with a 21 inches CRT, and 2048x1536 these PDF documents are readable. Have you tried it with 15 inches and 800x600 I fail to see how it could matter for the viewability

Re: [Flightgear-devel] How to get Doc without PDF format ?

2007-01-18 Thread gh.robin
On Thu 18 January 2007 19:15, Martin Spott wrote: gh.robin wrote: Nice, i' ll transmit your answer to my requesters , and ask them to be patient, before starting with FG. Do it, if you like. If you expect me to hurry up, then please pay me for the work on FlightGear-related stuff

Re: [Flightgear-devel] How to get Doc without PDF format ?

2007-01-18 Thread gh.robin
On Thu 18 January 2007 20:15, Joacim Persson wrote: SNIP Under the same conditions html reformats to fit. Y o u m e a n l i k e t h i s ? ; - ) ??? -- Gérard - Take Surveys. Earn Cash.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] take off on a mono-propeller plane with a very simple joystick

2007-01-18 Thread gh.robin
On Thu 18 January 2007 14:49, Sébastien MARQUE wrote: hi all, taking off the mono-propeller planes with a simple joystick (e.g. SideWinder) is very hard because of the propeller torque. you are obliged to play with keyboard, and it is not very confortable, not to say it is inefficient. I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data/Aircraft/Ki-84 Ki-84-set.xml, 1.4,

2007-01-21 Thread gh.robin
On Sun 21 January 2007 18:06, Melchior FRANZ wrote: * Martin Spott -- Sunday 21 January 2007: Melchior, did you talk to the author of the aircraft about this 'issue' ? I talked to him, but he didn't respond. (I wouldn't even have had to ask, as this is an architectural matter. Like

Re: [Flightgear-devel] autopilot broken by recent osg branch fgfs update

2007-01-23 Thread gh.robin
On Tue 23 January 2007 03:27, Dave Perry wrote: I updated both SimGear, fgfs source, and data for the osg branch yesterday. After the compiles and installs with no errors, none of the autopilots are working. This includes the default autopilot from the gui as well as the kap140 (I am testing

Re: [Flightgear-devel] autopilot broken by recent osg branch fgfsupdate

2007-01-23 Thread gh.robin
On Tue 23 January 2007 18:48, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote: On Tuesday 23 January 2007 16:00, gh.robin wrote: On Tue 23 January 2007 03:27, Dave Perry wrote: I updated both SimGear, fgfs source, and data for the osg branch yesterday. After the compiles and installs with no errors, none

Re: [Flightgear-devel] autopilot broken by recent osg branc h fgfsupdate

2007-01-24 Thread gh.robin
On Wed 24 January 2007 07:14, Dave Perry wrote: On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 18:48 +0100, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote: Just updated from CVS (HEAD (OSG)), and it seems to me that the autopilots are working. I tried the KAP140, and the generic in the pa28-161. Both worked fine in heading mode, and

[Flightgear-devel] reload Autopoilot Config with Nasal Program

2007-01-27 Thread gh.robin
Autopilot does not longer work with FG Head Branch (see previous mails from me, Lee, and Dave Perry regarding that missing or bug) . But if we do Menu/debug/Reload Autopilot, we get an autopilot working Is it possible to do that Reload Autopilot automatic with a Nasal Prog, within the

[Flightgear-devel] Broken-sky with OSG

2007-01-29 Thread gh.robin
Does anybody else has that ugly broken sky with FG Osg ? http://perso.orange.fr/GRTux/OSG-sky.jpg Regards -- Gérard - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get

[Flightgear-devel] Broken-sky with OSG

2007-01-29 Thread gh.robin
Does anybody else has that ugly broken sky with FG Osg ? http://perso.orange.fr/GRTux/OSG-sky.jpg Regards -- Gérard - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Broken-sky with OSG

2007-01-29 Thread gh.robin
On Mon 29 January 2007 18:16, Martin Spott wrote: gh.robin wrote: Does anybody else has that ugly broken sky with FG Osg ? If you would have read previous EMails, you would already know the answer ;-) Martin. BTW, a single posting would be sufficient. Oh so..so..so..sorry i di..di

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Broken-sky with OSG

2007-01-29 Thread gh.robin
On Mon 29 January 2007 19:11, Curtis Olson wrote: On 1/29/07, Mathias Fröhlich wrote: Known bug. But it does not happen on my machines. Even though, I have a machine with this effect reachable but not time yet to follow that bug ... I only found that problem when a message box

[Flightgear-devel] CVS: data/Aircraft/bell206/Models bell206

2007-02-02 Thread gh.robin
Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/bell206/Models In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv6329/Models Removed Files: bell206.ac bell206.xml Why that ... ? How to get the full flying Bell model ? Regards -- Gérard

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS: data/Aircraft/bell206/Models bell206

2007-02-02 Thread gh.robin
On Fri 2 February 2007 20:23, Martin Spott wrote: gh.robin wrote: Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/bell206/Models In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv6329/Models Removed Files: bell206.ac bell206.xml Why that ... ? Written in the CVS log message that you've

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS: data/Aircraft/bell206/Models bell206

2007-02-03 Thread gh.robin
On Sat 3 February 2007 19:59, Martin Spott wrote: gh.robin wrote: On Fri 2 February 2007 20:23, Martin Spott wrote: gh.robin wrote: Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/bell206/Models In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv6329/Models Removed Files: bell206.ac

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS: data/Aircraft/bell206/Models bell206

2007-02-04 Thread gh.robin
On Sat 3 February 2007 20:27, Melchior FRANZ wrote: Although the committed files were still GPL, I took the no-sell clause, the fictitious license, and finally the resistance and unresponsiveness to objections as a sign that the author is unreliable. I wanted to avoid another Crusader case.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS: data/Aircraft/bell206/Models bell206

2007-02-04 Thread gh.robin
On Sun 4 February 2007 13:22, Erik Hofman wrote: gh.robin wrote: Hello pauljs75 Welcome to the By_Melchior_Franz_Nomination Unreliable_Authors Club A bit unfair isn't it, I assume you're paying the penalties when copyright infringement is detected en we get sued by someone or some

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-08 Thread gh.robin
On Thu 8 February 2007 11:13, Thomas Förster wrote: Hi, I hit on a strange problem when using the --flight-plan commandline option with the default c172. All controls are working except the ailerons, which makes flying around a bit challenging... ;-) command line: fgfs --airport=EDDT

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-08 Thread gh.robin
On Thu 8 February 2007 23:09, Martin Spott wrote: gh.robin wrote: On Thu 8 February 2007 11:13, Thomas F?rster wrote: I hit on a strange problem when using the --flight-plan commandline option with the default c172. All controls are working except the ailerons, which makes flying

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-09 Thread gh.robin
On Fri 9 February 2007 18:07, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote: On Friday 09 February 2007 02:54, Dave Perry wrote: I believe that the problem Gérard and Lee has seen is not specific to the KAP140 autopilot. apInit in kap140.nas _only_ initializes the properties that belong to the KAP140 autopilot.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-09 Thread gh.robin
On Fri 9 February 2007 20:04, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote: Could you check the property browser before and after you reload the autopilot? Look at the /autopilot/new-config dir. Are all the controllers there prior to reloading the autopilot? (In the cd3 I see two pi-simple-controllers and

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-09 Thread gh.robin
On Fri 9 February 2007 20:22, leee wrote: It's difficult to imagine a system problem that might cause this behaviour, in view of the fact that resetting appears to fix the problem. However, I know that there are a few problems that I've seen here that no one else appears to have experienced

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-09 Thread gh.robin
On Sat 10 February 2007 01:15, gh.robin wrote: On Fri 9 February 2007 20:22, leee wrote: It's difficult to imagine a system problem that might cause this behaviour, in view of the fact that resetting appears to fix the problem. However, I know that there are a few problems that I've seen

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-10 Thread gh.robin
On Sat 10 February 2007 10:53, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote: On Saturday 10 February 2007 01:08, gh.robin wrote: Hello Roy, I do not notice any differences regarding /autopilot/new-config dir between first load values (after FG loaded) and after reload autopilot. i get two pi-simple

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-10 Thread gh.robin
On Sun 11 February 2007 01:01, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote: On Sunday 11 February 2007 00:29, gh.robin wrote: The autopilot is holding the wings level, right. I think characterizing this as crazy is very misleading. One might think that it was turning left and right. Yes , in that case crazy

Re: [Flightgear-devel] how to create text instruments in 3d?

2007-02-26 Thread gh.robin
On Mon 26 February 2007 18:30, Mathias Fröhlich wrote: On Thursday 22 February 2007, Stewart Andreason wrote: I have been learning how to create instrumentation in 3d, but would like to have some text-based displays, like in the 737. How can I translate that: instruments layer

Re: [Flightgear-devel] no more AAR.nas, please!

2007-02-26 Thread gh.robin
On Mon 26 February 2007 23:02, Martin Spott wrote: Hi Melchior, Melchior FRANZ wrote: Please stop committing any more of those crappy AAR.nas files. This aircraft is still in development (at least I consider this to be the case ;-) - a friendly pointer would have been completely

Re: [Flightgear-devel] no more AAR.nas, please!

2007-02-27 Thread gh.robin
On Tue 27 February 2007 00:07, Martin Spott wrote: Martin Spott wrote: What would you define as free ? Well, there's no dictate of what you should do or what you should avoid to to, but FlightGear certainly benefits from the attempt to keep a certain level of good taste. s/keep/maintain/g

Re: [Flightgear-devel] An2 problems

2007-03-10 Thread gh.robin
On Sat 10 March 2007 15:11, Jon S. Berndt wrote: How are the brakes ? -Fred The brakes (using JSBSim in standalone mode) must be intentionally set. I've checked the gear forces. They are as expected. Jon OK, I think I have a solution. It *does* have to something to do with

Re: [Flightgear-devel] An2 problems

2007-03-12 Thread gh.robin
On Mon 12 March 2007 15:18, Gene Buckle wrote: What's frustrating is that the aircraft doesn't seem to want to move. That should be a generic bug for all piston aircraft - if not all aircraft. I've created a script for testing the AN2. I have modified the engine file (as described). I can

Re: [Flightgear-devel] An2 problems

2007-03-12 Thread gh.robin
On Mon 12 March 2007 16:16, gh.robin wrote: SNIP This may be the first thing that everyone looked at, but are the brakes set? (does it have brakes?) g. He Gene the problem has been solved by Jon look at thiis AND we only need from Yurik V. Nikiforoff A CVS update

[Flightgear-devel] access to flightgear-cvslogs

2007-04-01 Thread gh.robin
hello, Trying to access to http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=flightgear-cvslogs I get * SF.net * Error Error ERROR No Forum Chosen Where is the error. Regards. -- Gérard -

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Time for a new release?

2007-04-02 Thread gh.robin
On Fri 30 March 2007 17:43, Stuart Buchanan wrote: Hi All, It hasn't been discussed for at least a couple of months, so I thought I'd bring up that old chestnut, when are we going to have a new release?. From the website, here are the pervious release dates: 0.9.5 - 2004/07 0.9.6 -

[Flightgear-devel] H4-Hercules-wrong FDM author name

2007-04-07 Thread gh.robin
Hello, I notice, these two files ___data/Aircraft/H4-Hercules/h4-hercules-base.xml ___data/Aircraft/H4-Hercules/h4-hercules-jsbsim.xml refer to my name, Gérard ROBIN. In spite of the honor to be taken as a specialist, i never did anything regarding the FDM, but explaining on

Re: [Flightgear-devel] framerate hesitations...

2007-04-10 Thread gh.robin
On Tue 10 April 2007 19:21, Jeff McBride wrote: On 4/10/07, Syd Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all , Not sure how to describe this , I get a barely visible hesitation in framerates while flying, about once a second . Noticed it in the Aerostar , so I suspected my Nasal electrical

Re: [Flightgear-devel] OSG, make, and cmake?

2007-04-11 Thread gh.robin
On Wed 11 April 2007 16:12, Curtis Olson wrote: On 4/11/07, Tim Moore wrote: It's a major shift, to be able to more automatically support Windows and Mac 0S X. Already it's an improvement, putting libraries in the proper /usr/local/lib64 on FC6 64 bit machines. On Fedora Core 6 I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [RFC] tacan rewrite

2007-04-13 Thread gh.robin
On Fri 13 April 2007 10:31, Vivian Meazza wrote: SNIP Yes - this is Mathias' business, I really can't comment, except to say that I would be surprised if there were anything much wrong with his code, and certainly not his mathematics. Have I missed anything? Yup - if it ain't broke don't

Re: [Flightgear-devel] An-2 v0.2 ready!

2007-04-13 Thread gh.robin
On Fri 13 April 2007 05:54, Yurik V. Nikiforoff wrote: Apr, Friday, 13 :) 3D cockpit. 80 animated/controlled items on panels! Engine prop has rewritten; New animation for gear; Automatic mixture correction (like real aircraft); New ADF control gauge; Automatic slats with real aerodynamic

Re: [Flightgear-devel] An-2 v0.2 ready!

2007-04-13 Thread gh.robin
On Fri 13 April 2007 14:34, gh.robin wrote: On Fri 13 April 2007 13:12, Yurik V. Nikiforoff wrote: В сообщении от 13 Апрель 2007 17:51 gh.robin написал(a): When loading an2, the splash.rgb file makes segmentation error, if i remove it everything is right. sim version pls

Re: [Flightgear-devel] An-2 v0.2 ready!

2007-04-13 Thread gh.robin
On Fri 13 April 2007 17:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:43:49 +0200, gh.robin wrote And if i take the splash.rgb file with Gimp load and save, i get a working an2 loaded with that new splash file. It seems I set not correct rgb options when save file. But I use gimp too

Re: [Flightgear-devel] An-2 v0.2 ready!

2007-04-13 Thread gh.robin
On Fri 13 April 2007 18:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:40:12 +0200, gh.robin wrote I did used RLE compress. (load and save) The best could be for you to get the resulting splash.rgb file working for me Well, I understand. Gimp have agressive RLE compression. I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] An-2 v0.2 ready!

2007-04-20 Thread gh.robin
On Fri 20 April 2007 12:29, Anders Gidenstam wrote: On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Yurik V. Nikiforoff wrote: Please, no. controls.adjPropeller will change value of /controls/engines/engine/propeller-pitch, but it property has controlled by automatic pitch subsystem (see prop_handler() from

Re: [Flightgear-devel] twin phantom airplane with last compile FG OSG

2007-04-27 Thread gh.robin
On Fri 27 April 2007 21:22, Syd Sandy wrote: Sébastien MARQUE wrote: Hi all, I just finished a fresh compile of FG and OSG today, then I've found a bug (which I've been told to be solved in the past): I can pilot not only one, but two airplanes ;-) it is quite a funny bug, so I took

Re: [Flightgear-devel] framerate hesitations...

2007-05-01 Thread gh.robin
On Tue 1 May 2007 17:46, leee wrote: On Tuesday 01 May 2007 14:04, Melchior FRANZ wrote: SNIP Back then I seemed to be the only one who saw it, and while turning AI off did indeed help, I'm not sure if it was the cause. Maybe it just avoided some timing problem that's really caused by

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Frame rates

2007-05-03 Thread gh.robin
On Fri 4 May 2007 01:12, John Wojnaroski wrote: Hi, Is there any info/data on FG frame rates with OSG vis-a-vis previous plib versions running on comparable hardware? Running with the 23 Apr release of OSG and the latest FG/SG software I'm seeing frame rates around 22 fps. The same

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Frame rates

2007-05-04 Thread gh.robin
On Fri 4 May 2007 08:52, Martin Spott wrote: John Wojnaroski wrote: Is there any info/data on FG frame rates with OSG vis-a-vis previous plib versions running on comparable hardware? The last time when I compared FlightGear with PLIB scenegraph against OpenSceneGraph, is several several

Re: [Flightgear-devel] view manager news fly by view

2007-05-04 Thread gh.robin
On Fri 4 May 2007 22:09, Melchior FRANZ wrote: Today I have reorganized the view handling and added a new view mode. It's still work in progress, but looks quite nice already: Fly-By View This picks a view position somewhere ahead and lets the aircraft fly by, then searches a new position

Re: [Flightgear-devel] view manager news fly by view

2007-05-05 Thread gh.robin
On Sat 5 May 2007 01:43, Josh Babcock wrote: SNIP If my understanding is right, I guess that tool will be useful when , during model devel, we try to tune complexe animations, (survey/observation from to a specific point ) Cool, I've wanted this for a long time. Now if I can only find

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Latest OT/OSG/SG/FG unusable

2007-05-09 Thread gh.robin
On Mon 7 May 2007 17:05, Nick Warne wrote: Hi all, There seems to be an issue, reported by a few in IRC. Latest build from SVN/CVS makes FG unusable. Frame rates are (for me) at least 60% worse. E.g. pc7 at FHAW - before 43 - today after updates, 18. Lightning at KSFO - before 19 -

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-users] Any new version in sight?

2007-05-10 Thread gh.robin
Hello Curt, Only one question: Which FG do you intend to implement, FG with OSG libraries or FG with Plib libraries only ? You know some of us are getting trouble with the OSG version. Regards -- Gérard - This

[Flightgear-devel] Radar improvement

2007-05-10 Thread gh.robin
Hello everybody, Their is a radar improvement, which has been developed recently by Vivian. That improvement is working perfectly. Many thanks to Vivian. That update has not been released into CVS. Is their any reason ? Regards -- Gérard

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Latest OT/OSG/SG/FG unusable

2007-05-11 Thread gh.robin
On Fri 11 May 2007 15:28, Csaba Halász wrote: On 5/10/07, Nick Warne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am surprised nobody using CVS/SVN FG/SG/OSG reports this issue (or replied to this) - there was a lot of chatter about it in IRC. The OSG SVN from last friday works for me as usual (with SG/FG

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Latest OT/OSG/SG/FG unusable

2007-05-11 Thread gh.robin
On Fri 11 May 2007 22:30, Georg Vollnhals wrote: gh.robin schrieb: Again, After many research, i have found an OSG svn/cvs version which suit to me, good frame rate close to that one i get with plib (plib with 3D clouds and shadow). That version is dated 10-04-2007. Regards

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Latest OT/OSG/SG/FG unusable

2007-05-12 Thread gh.robin
On Sat 12 May 2007 02:29, Georg Vollnhals wrote: Georg Vollnhals schrieb: Just as a feedback, compiled without problem with the latest SimGear/FlightGear CVS. Now my old framerates are back. Really a big difference! There are several strange little display errors but I can live with that

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Radar improvement

2007-05-12 Thread gh.robin
On Fri 11 May 2007 19:13, Vivian Meazza wrote: Actually, the problem doesn't lie within the code affected by this improvement - the offending file is Instrumentation/od_gauge.cxx, and AFAIKS see the problem is in osg, not in our code. When that is fixed, the radar, improved or otherwise will

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Latest OT/OSG/SG/FG unusable

2007-05-13 Thread gh.robin
On Sat 12 May 2007 23:01, Matthias Boerner wrote: Hallo Georg, I have done a fresh checkout of OSG, PLIB, SimGear and FlightGear today at 3 pm in the afternoon. Everything compiled without a problem. But I don't realize a drop in frame rates. But in contrast to my last checkout of 24th April

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Latest OT/OSG/SG/FG unusable

2007-05-13 Thread gh.robin
On Sun 13 May 2007 17:41, Matthias Boerner wrote: Hello Gerard, Hello Mathias, Your 10-20 frames more, seems to me very poor regarding the comparison, i get from 10 to 15 fps with the recent one and a now with that old one i recover from 60 to 85, which is a huge difference. I get

Re: [Flightgear-devel] c130

2007-05-14 Thread gh.robin
On Mon 14 May 2007 16:18, Martin Spott wrote: Emmanuel, Markus Zojer wrote: I really enjoy the flight with this plane, especially the 110kts landings :-) I noticed, that the sim model is not in sync with the 3d model, so I changed Models/c130.xml to pathc130.ac/path offsets

[Flightgear-devel] Missing-Generic tile over the sea

2007-05-15 Thread gh.robin
Hello, The generic tiles over the sea is/are missing. Tested with last cvs SG/FG built with last svn OSG and with last cvs SG/FG built with older svn OSG (10-April 2007) here snapshot http://perso.orange.fr/GRTux/FG_OSG_Generic-Tile.jpg -- Gérard

[Flightgear-devel] FG version 0.9.11

2007-05-15 Thread gh.robin
Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/source/src/Main In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv1534/src/Main Modified Files: Tag: PRE_OSG_PLIB_20061029 main.cxx Log Message: Updates for 0.9.11-pre1 release. Does cvs HEAD remains to be 0.9.10 version regarding Data ? Regards -- Gérard

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FG version 0.9.11

2007-05-15 Thread gh.robin
for. Sorry for the short term inconsistency. There are a number of pieces that need to all get changed at once, but I'm stuck doing only one thing at a time here. Regards, Curt. On 5/15/07, gh.robin wrote: Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/source/src/Main In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv1534

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FG version 0.9.11

2007-05-15 Thread gh.robin
On Tue 15 May 2007 19:33, Martin Spott wrote: Curtis Olson wrote: Currently the data package is released with only a subset of all the available aircraft: 737-300, A-10, bf109, bo105, c172p, c310, c310u3a, Citation-Bravo, f16, j3cub, Hunter, p51d, pa28-16, Rascal, T38, ufo,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Missing-Generic tile over the sea

2007-05-15 Thread gh.robin
On Tue 15 May 2007 20:03, Nick Warne wrote: On Tuesday 15 May 2007 14:04:16 gh.robin wrote: Hello, The generic tiles over the sea is/are missing. Tested with last cvs SG/FG built with last svn OSG and with last cvs SG/FG built with older svn OSG (10-April 2007) here snapshot

[Flightgear-devel] FlightGear-0.9.11-pre1-------Carriers are Flying

2007-05-16 Thread gh.robin
Hello, With FlightGear-0.9.11-pre1 it is something strange we have Flying Carriers. Here snapshots http://perso.orange.fr/GRTux/Carrier-Flying1.jpg http://perso.orange.fr/GRTux/Carrier-Flying2.jpg http://perso.orange.fr/GRTux/Carrier-Flying3.jpg Regards -- Gérard

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear-0.9.11-pre1----- --Carriers are Flying

2007-05-17 Thread gh.robin
On Thu 17 May 2007 12:40, George Patterson wrote: On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 03:10 +0200, gh.robin wrote: Hello, With FlightGear-0.9.11-pre1 it is something strange we have Flying Carriers. Here snapshots http://perso.orange.fr/GRTux/Carrier-Flying1.jpg http

Re: [Flightgear-devel] patch for osgViewer and statistics

2007-05-17 Thread gh.robin
On Tue 15 May 2007 00:32, Tim Moore wrote: Howdy, This patch implements the option of using OpenSceneGraph's osgViewer instead of SDL or glut. The major user visible difference is the availability of OSG statistics, as seen in http://www.bricoworks.com/moore/osgstats.png, which show the time

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear-0.9.11-pre1-------Carriers areFlying

2007-05-18 Thread gh.robin
On Thu 17 May 2007 18:19, Vivian Meazza wrote: It's not a bug it's a feature! The carrier operates in the same frame of reference as aircraft - it has to otherwise you couldn't catch wires correctly. Unfortunately, the sea surface does not - elsewhere on the sea surface you will see the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] patch for osgViewer and statistics

2007-05-18 Thread gh.robin
On Thu 17 May 2007 22:28, Tim Moore wrote: SNIP It's hard to assign a meaning to these times in isolation, except to note that 16 milliseconds total is the magic number that gives you a frame rate of 60hz. The large cull time indicates poor scene graph layout; possibly there's a problem with

Re: [Flightgear-devel] patch for osgViewer and statistics

2007-05-18 Thread gh.robin
On Thu 17 May 2007 22:28, Tim Moore wrote: SNIP The Cull is basically very high compared to the other values but when i fly over the sea (without tiles as i said in an other topic). What is exactly the meaning of the Cull value ? It's hard to assign a meaning to these times in isolation,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] patch for osgViewer and statistics

2007-05-19 Thread gh.robin
Hello Tim, Mathias, This is a digest of tests i have done , (and a repeat of previous separated mails) I try to understand the big FPS differences i get when i build FG first with an old OSG library 10 april 2007, second with a recent OSG library 1.9.4 version FG was patched with Tim Moore

Re: [Flightgear-devel] F80C FDM patch for additional contact points and more correct 3d-model location

2007-05-19 Thread gh.robin
On Sat 19 May 2007 17:34, Anders Gidenstam wrote: Hi all, I recently noticed that the F80C has a tendency to flip upside down on the runway and then keep rolling along upside down hanging from its wheels. This diff adds contact points at the wingtip fuel tanks and at the nose and tail. I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] F80C FDM patch for additional contact points and more correct 3d-model location

2007-05-19 Thread gh.robin
On Sat 19 May 2007 18:40, Jon S. Berndt wrote: Hi all, I recently noticed that the F80C has a tendency to flip upside down on the runway and then keep rolling along upside down hanging from its wheels. This diff adds contact points at the wingtip fuel tanks and at the nose and

Re: [Flightgear-devel] patch for osgViewer and statistics

2007-05-21 Thread gh.robin
On Mon 21 May 2007 19:46, Mathias Fröhlich wrote: Hi, On Saturday 19 May 2007, gh.robin wrote: I try to understand the big FPS differences i get when i build FG first with an old OSG library 10 april 2007, second with a recent OSG library 1.9.4 version I believe that you built osg

[Flightgear-devel] FlightGear-0.9.11-pre1---JSBSim update ?

2007-05-24 Thread gh.robin
Hello, the JSBSim cvs stand alone has got some improvements , would not it be useful to update FG 0.9.11 with the last JSBSim version ? Regards -- Gérard - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear-0.9.11-pre1---JSBSim update ?

2007-05-24 Thread gh.robin
On Thu 24 May 2007 16:03, Martin Spott wrote: gh.robin wrote: the JSBSim cvs stand alone has got some improvements , Of which flavour ? Martin. hmmm, was only a question. And i don't understand your answer -- Gérard

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear-0.9.11-pre1---JSBSim update ?

2007-05-24 Thread gh.robin
On Thu 24 May 2007 16:09, gh.robin wrote: On Thu 24 May 2007 16:03, Martin Spott wrote: gh.robin wrote: the JSBSim cvs stand alone has got some improvements , Of which flavour ? Martin. hmmm, was only a question. And i don't understand your answer Well, i just get

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs]

2007-05-28 Thread gh.robin
On Sun 27 May 2007 20:48, Jon S. Berndt wrote: Erik Hofman wrote: Too much troubles, too little time. And there is no rush to have them synced right now IMHO. Ah, that's a great pity ! Personally I don't have the slightest interest in the PLIB release. What I care about and what

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs]

2007-05-28 Thread gh.robin
On Mon 28 May 2007 13:53, you wrote: Many thanks to Erik who did the job on the PLIB branch, everything is right. And thanks to Jon who made these improvements on the JSBSim. Jon will it be possible to get that tar file , i am interested in trying it, and in using it ? Is there a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] For the - Author of Concorde - VIDEO of actual errors - Continued

2007-05-29 Thread gh.robin
On Tue 29 May 2007 04:59, Forums Virgin Net wrote: 04/ Further: As promised here is a video showing how the control surfaces act in oposition to the commands sent to them! Download Link http://files.ww.com/files/33558.html (Web Browser Interface)

Re: [Flightgear-devel] strange behavior of 0.9.11-pre1

2007-05-29 Thread gh.robin
On Tue 29 May 2007 10:46, Ladislav Michnovič wrote: 2007/5/28, Pigeon [EMAIL PROTECTED]: If I changed the view strange overlaying triangles were visible on the sky. Does anybody similar problems? A while ago a few of us has come to a conclusion that it only happens with the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] strange behavior of 0.9.11-pre1

2007-05-29 Thread gh.robin
On Tue 29 May 2007 14:33, gh.robin wrote: On Tue 29 May 2007 10:46, Ladislav Michnovič wrote: 2007/5/28, Pigeon [EMAIL PROTECTED]: If I changed the view strange overlaying triangles were visible on the sky. Does anybody similar problems? A while ago a few of us has come

[Flightgear-devel] A new GPL model is coming = Transport twin boom aircraft Nord 2502

2007-05-29 Thread gh.robin
Hello , A transport aircraft model is under construction, by the next days a first alpha version will be available. That aircraft is the Nord 2502 here is the link on Wikipedia which gives a descriptions of the real ones french http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nord_2501 english

Re: [Flightgear-devel] A new GPL model is coming = Transport twin boomaircraft Nord 2502

2007-05-29 Thread gh.robin
On Tue 29 May 2007 15:55, Berndt, Jon S wrote: Hello , A transport aircraft model is under construction, by the next days a first alpha version will be available. That aircraft is the Nord 2502 here is the link on Wikipedia which gives a descriptions of the real ones french

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs]

2007-05-29 Thread gh.robin
On Tue 29 May 2007 18:52, Martin Spott wrote: gh.robin wrote: May be Martin could include it in the FG osg cvs. Others have CVS write access to the source code. I don't - and I don't want to, Martin. Oh sorry Martin, i did no know, but like we can say 'We loan only to rich

Re: [Flightgear-devel] A new GPL model is coming = Transport twin boom aircraft Nord 2502

2007-05-31 Thread gh.robin
On Tue 29 May 2007 15:16, gh.robin wrote: Hello , A transport aircraft model is under construction, by the next days a first alpha version will be available. That aircraft is the Nord 2502 here is the link on Wikipedia which gives a descriptions of the real ones french http

Re: [Flightgear-devel] radar x-shift and y-shift patch

2007-06-01 Thread gh.robin
On Fri 1 June 2007 06:11, syd sandy wrote: On Thu, 31 May 2007 21:06:20 -0700 syd sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry forgot to change subject line the first time ... Hi all, Ive attached patches that normalize radar x-shift and y-shift to /instrumentation/radar/range, which makes

[Flightgear-devel] F-8E Crusader

2007-06-01 Thread gh.robin
Hello, everybody That model is being in use on the french side community with the older JSBsim version 1.65 ( Carrier patched of Mathias), and the model itself is operational since March 2006. I have just made a crude conversion of the FDM from JSBSim version 1.65 to JSBSim 2.0. The

[Flightgear-devel] F4U-7, (dubbed Only for French)

2007-06-01 Thread gh.robin
Hello, everybody That model has exactly the same F-8E problem, it is missing an official JSBSim Carrier feature. That model is not recent. I have made from an older JSBsim FDM v 1.65 the FDM V2 compatible Here is the package http://perso.orange.fr/GRTux/F4U7-spe.tar.gz Flying on both FG

  1   2   3   >