On Thursday 02 November 2006 12:20, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
[snip...]
that was a good read Torsten, thanks for posting it.
LeeE
...or something
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get
-indicator
indicated-roll-deg alias=/orientation/roll-deg/
/attitude-indicator
/instrumentation
Erik
That's interesting - is it possible to re-define it while FG is running?
LeeE
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more
On Tuesday 07 November 2006 20:11, Curtis Olson wrote:
On 11/7/06, leee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect that the graphics will prove to be the trickiest problem - it's
by
far the greatest resource user -
Right, in all this we need to remember that in all our past benchmarking
at the time so just made them pivot). The number of segments would
define how 'smooth' the bent wing would look. If there was a curve based
i.e. nurbs renderer available it would be a simple matter but afaik there's
no such beast outside of 3d packages.
LeeE
On Saturday 02 December 2006 20:03
references to maneuver the aircraft rather than instruments.
So, should I use YASim or JSBSim for this project?
-Stuart
YASim relies upon having an elevator so you'll have to use JSBSim, or possibly
UIUC.
LeeE
-
Take
to 26 but are very smooth, making these
brief pauses clearly noticeable.
I thought it might be due to another process running but I've tried shutting
down possible candidates without effect.
It doesn't seem to make any difference if multiplay, Atlas or terrasynch is
used.
Any ideas?
LeeE
Thanks to all for suggesting areas to look into i.e. AI aircraft and X11
vsynch settings - both are candidates here. I might have a look at the
kernel preemption too.
I'll report back...
LeeE
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash
On Saturday 09 December 2006 19:55, leee wrote:
Thanks to all for suggesting areas to look into i.e. AI aircraft and X11
vsynch settings - both are candidates here. I might have a look at the
kernel preemption too.
I'll report back...
LeeE
Well, I've tried removing references to AI
On Friday 15 December 2006 10:14, Joacim Persson wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, leee wrote:
Well, I've tried removing references to AI aircraft, including removing
references to it from preferences.xml, ensuring that the VBlank nVidia
settings are checked and also re-compiling my kernel
, the timer rates I've specified should result in a lower
frequency than that from the listeners, so this might be having some effect
as well.
It does seem to look like some sort of listener related problem.
LeeE
-
Take
On Friday 15 December 2006 16:12, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* leee -- Friday 15 December 2006 17:04:
I've replaced most of the listeners, at least all the high-frequency ones
that were being called every frame, with timers [...]
It doesn't make much sense to attach listeners to properties
On Friday 15 December 2006 19:33, Joacim Persson wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, leee wrote:
Could a few other people give the SU-37 a bit of a run and see if they
notice any SU-37 specific problems?
I've been buzzing the KSFO tower and downtown SF now back and forth at mach
1.5 for 15 minutes
On Saturday 16 December 2006 12:26, Georg Vollnhals wrote:
Georg Vollnhals schrieb:
leee schrieb:
...
It does seem to look like some sort of listener related problem.
LeeE
My tests were made with OpenSuse 10.2 OS and the latest FG OSG compile -
I could not crosscheck to PLIB
. For example, the k/b could be set up so that the left
hand keys have constant functions i.e. necessary fundamental operations but
the right hand keys would have different functions depending on the mode i.e.
specific instrument controls such as radios or radar etc or even weapons
systems.
LeeE
degree
atm.
LeeE
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http
of the FDMs and what I might have been
trying to do in some of the control systems stuff.
LeeE
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
start-up. I also had problems with some AP controllers seeming not to work
after I removed other unrelated redundant controllers but didn't have enough
time to look further into it or establish any consistency.
LeeE
the grills with a texture, rendered from the model itself,
Anyway, let me know if you want it (it's a UK loco remember, not a US one, so
just that fact might cause some confusion among the viewers) and if so, what
sort of time-scale would it be needed by.
LeeE
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 21:59, AJ MacLeod wrote:
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 19:20, leee wrote:
I did a UK Class 56 diesel loco for a picture I was working on and
you're welcome to that but I didn't need any wagons for the pic so I cant
help you there. Perhaps a 'light' engine movement
into the equation i.e. a U.K loco in a U.S. scenario.
I could make something suitable, given the drawings, but it would take a lot
of time and effort. The best bet might be to buy the models if no free ones
can be found - I'll have a bit of a dig around, see what I can find and get
back to you.
LeeE
the interpolation time to be relative to the aircraft
speed, to simulate the effect changing over distance instead of time.
LeeE
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 23:45, Curtis Olson wrote:
On 1/31/07, leee wrote:
The RS3D format isn't included on the OSG website but I wouldn't expect
it to
be as doesn't just include surface type objects but also mathematical
ones such as analytical solids.
For example, think
On Thursday 01 February 2007 00:50, leee wrote:
On Thursday 01 February 2007 00:35, Curtis Olson wrote:
On 1/31/07, alexis bory wrote:
leee a écrit :
Thanks:) If you need something to drive down to the railway
station...
http://www.spatial.freeserve.co.uk/V3/im_GT40.16.jpg
On Thursday 01 February 2007 01:10, Norman Vine wrote:
Leee writes
It had occurred to me that YASim could be (ab)used to fake a
car. The gear handling would be fine for the wheels and
suspension - don't see too many problems there. Ensuring it
didn't take off might be trickier though
On Thursday 01 February 2007 09:55, Joacim Persson wrote:
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, leee wrote:
On Thursday 01 February 2007 00:35, Curtis Olson wrote:
For what it's worth, if someone wanted to adapt one of our existing
fdm's to do automotive vehicle dynamics, that would be a cool thing
thoroughly enjoyed
putting the model together, but I often find myself in the minority on
things like this. :-) It was almost cool enough to be sucked into
building a virtual -
paper model converter ... hmmm
That's it Curt. FoldGear.
Josh
LOL :))
LeeE
- in half a dozeeen tests, most of the time it was the same
controllers that seemed not to be working but in two tests there seemed to be
a couple of additional ones that didn't want to play.
LeeE
-
Using Tomcat but need to do
On Friday 09 February 2007 01:54, Dave Perry wrote:
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 00:25 +, leee wrote:
Just checked again, with current cvs osg/simgear/flightgear, and I still
got the same problems. As before, re-setting the A/P via the menu seems
to kick everything into life. There also
On Friday 09 February 2007 17:07, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
On Friday 09 February 2007 02:54, Dave Perry wrote:
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 00:25 +, leee wrote:
Just checked again, with current cvs osg/simgear/flightgear, and I
still got the same problems. As before, re-setting the A/P via
On Friday 09 February 2007 18:14, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
On Friday 09 February 2007 18:24, leee wrote:
Hi Roy,
I am getting this with the SU-37 and I believe the version in cvs
displays the problems. This is a pretty complex A/P setup with cascading
up to three levels and it also
thing I can think of in view of
the fact that I'm using Debian Stable and the gcc version is pretty old. I'm
not sure that would explain the history of the problem either, that is, it
was working ok then stopped working ok.
I'm afraid I can't do a lot of testing for you on this.
LeeE
On Friday 09 February 2007 19:45, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
On Friday 09 February 2007 20:22, leee wrote:
It's difficult to imagine a system problem that might cause this
behaviour, in view of the fact that resetting appears to fix the problem.
However, I know that there are a few problems
I couldn't see a parameter to enable dynamic view in the command line but it
seemed ok if I enabled it via the menu. The view pitched a small amount when
I enabled it and pitched back when I disabled it.
LeeE
On Friday 09 February 2007 20:51, Maik Justus wrote:
Hi LeeE,
can you start
On Friday 09 February 2007 21:36, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
On Friday 09 February 2007 21:13, leee wrote:
Just tried another quick test.
Opened five property browsers - autopilot/locks, autopilot/settings,
autopilot/internal, autopilot/FCS/locks autopilot/FCS/controls - all
seemed ok
with the autopilots using
--auto-coordinate?
Ron
Not here.
LeeE
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM
On Sunday 11 February 2007 00:37, leee wrote:
On Friday 09 February 2007 21:36, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
On Friday 09 February 2007 21:13, leee wrote:
Just tried another quick test.
Opened five property browsers - autopilot/locks, autopilot/settings,
autopilot/internal, autopilot
On Sunday 11 February 2007 09:02, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
On Sunday 11 February 2007 02:14, leee wrote:
I thought I'd give it another go, with debug on the pitch-hold controller
and waddya know - this time the pitch hold worked and the alt hold
failed.
Ok - so I set debugging on all
period. This is
certainly going to result in some unpredictable behaviour across different
systems and I wouldn't be surprised if some of the other subsystems are
equally limited in their rates.
LeeE
-
Using Tomcat but need
On Monday 12 February 2007 19:10, Curtis Olson wrote:
On 2/12/07, leee wrote:
On Monday 12 February 2007 17:54, Jim Campbell wrote:
Hi,
Curtis has already hinted as to how the following may be done with his
remote FDM.
To my mind flightgear can be broken down into distinct plugin
)
For a single model - don't worry too much, for n models as few as possible.
LeeE
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions
On Friday 16 February 2007 02:39, Stewart Andreason wrote:
leee wrote:
On Thursday 15 February 2007 21:45, Berndt, Jon S wrote:
What's a realistic upper limit for polygon count now for an aircraft
model? 5000? 1? 25000?
What's definitely out?
Jon
AFAIK, current top-end vid
of a grass display.
LeeE
attachment: Screenshot.jpg
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief
writes
correct values but the code you suggest will fail if the value is corrupt and
will hi-light the underlying problem.
I guess that including validation of data in each function would be a good
idea but once again, I don't know what sort of performance hit that would
cause.
LeeE
and the A/P subsequently suffered from inconsistent timing issues and PID
controllers refusing to work until reset, so there may have been a wider
problem.
LeeE
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2
and try
to knock them into better shape for discussion.
LeeE
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click
the current facility.
LeeE
On Friday 04 May 2007 00:38, Heiko Schulz wrote:
Hi,
Hmm... maybe it's too late and I'm too tired. Did I
understand right? So maybe it would be possible to
simulate a Panavia Tornado's Terrain Following system?
Or a better ground follwing of AI-vehicules?
HHS
--- leee
the ground a little shorter than this - iirc, I tried to tune it so
that it could just, and only just, get over the hills after leaving on KSFO
27, figuring that it would be in the right ball park and that it had to work
at the default FG airport.
LeeE
On Friday 25 May 2007 10:36, Joacim Persson wrote:
On Fri, 25 May 2007, leee wrote:
http://www.air-and-space.com/Antonov%20An-225%20Mriya.htm
it's the rear four sets. This site also has some nice pics of the main
gear, which show that the front three and rear four units are different
because it would have had no effect on the behaviour or
appearance of the aircraft but would have required a lot of work to re-align
all of the animations. Well, that was my excuse:)
LeeE
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2
computer stuff because nothing is actually 100%
black in real life but in a computer simulation, if you use 0 0 0 rgb black
you'll get 0 0 0 rgb black and the result will be a silhouette.
LeeE
-
This SF.net email is sponsored
, there has been no hint of YASim being
adapted to work with unpowered or tailless/elevatorless aircraft so it looks
like you'll either have to use JSBSim or UIUC if you want any real accuracy
for these types of aircraft.
LeeE
On Monday 02 July 2007 09:24, Heiko Schulz wrote:
Hi,
At first thanks
?
for (ii = 0; ii 5; ii+=1){
...
nnn = props.globals.getNode(feat ~ /serviceable, 1);
if (nnn.getValue() == nil) {
nnn.setBoolValue(1);
Or is nnn an acronym for something?
m.
Is it really worth making an issue over two and three character local variable
names?
LeeE
in the
real world, and that is really where the problem is.
LeeE
On Friday 13 July 2007 07:14, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
Hi,
should this really be part of a flight simulation software? If yes, what
will be the next step?
- Should the demolition of buildings be modeled?
- What about humans in the scenery
On Saturday 14 July 2007 18:48, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* leee -- Saturday 14 July 2007:
Perhaps FG has reached the point where it positively needs some
sort of oversight management and planning, as seems to happen
with many, if not most, large-scale Open-source projects
e.g. Apache, Wine
, as I re-applied the weather
settings (without actually changing anything) I would see the wind
speed/direction jump at random between the 3000ft, 6000ft 9000ft settings.
LeeE
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc
an account of the first air-tow flight and apparently
both the and observer were terrified by the experience, the whole flight
being more or less completely out of control:)
LeeE
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc
and Melchior responded that he'd been experiencing it for some
time before then. At that time, Melchior thought it was related to the AI
sub-system.
The thread subject was Periodic 'stutter' in FG
LeeE
-
This SF.net email
and then finding that the PID controller
sampling rates were not working at the Ts sample rate but were tied to the
frame rate, which made it impossible to tune them for consistant operation, I
gave it up.
LeeE
-
This SF.net email
ones to install correctly after I used the DAAMIT uninstall
procedure to remove it.
However, I've been reading some reports recently that suggest that DAAMIT's
OGL support is set to improve soon, but I'll wait and see.
In the mean time, you could try the Xorg drivers.
LeeE
On Monday 10 September 2007 08:42, Holger Wirtz wrote:
LeeE,
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 04:00:50PM +0100, leee wrote:
[...]
Since moving to Debian etch (stable) on all of my systems, for the first
time I seem to have a stable and working driver for my old 9200 based
video card in the form
, I'd need to hear both sides of this argument, which doesn't
seem to be in the spirit of Open-source.
LeeE
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http
On Friday 14 September 2007 00:41, leee wrote:
On Thursday 13 September 2007 15:27, Forums Virgin Net wrote:
Hi,
Just some Information about part 3 of the Movie, The new concorde
Build still has some issues such as the Vertical Speed does not work it
still latches to full + (Plus
do
this before you try to take off:)
hth
LeeE
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01
of windows boxes already, and will have already been
analysed.
Alternatively, and as it would be a low workload service, it could probably be
done in java if you want to run it on the client.
LeeE
-
This SF.net email
FG I found
that the autopilot PID controllers ran at the frame rate and not at the Ts
rate specified in the controller definitions, which could make them unstable
outside a fairly narrow range of fps.
LeeE
-
This SF.net
time based _need_ to run at fixed
rates in any case), what would be the best solution?
LeeE
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events
with just the graphics subsystem having a variable rate and using
the resources that were left over after the other subsystems had their
bite.
LeeE
This is starting to enter the realm of my own opinions so please keep
that in mind.
Nasal was never intended to do work at this low level. However
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 18:30, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* leee -- Wednesday 24 October 2007:
the FDM operates at a fixed rate (I believe the default is 120 Hz)
but nearly everything else, afaikt, operates at the frame rate,
which varies.
Yes, but most Nasal code does things
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 19:15, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* leee -- Wednesday 24 October 2007:
the A/P controllers and filters, which were the real problem, are
independent of Nasal and would remain a problem until they could
guarantee a fixed rate regardless of the frame rate.
The FDM
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 19:41, Curtis Olson wrote:
On 10/24/07, leee wrote:
Hmm... I always thought that it ran asynchronously from the rest of
FG, at a steady rate. Surely this can't be a good thing?
It really seems to me that the only subsystem in FG where variable
timing won't
Hi all,
I'm getting the following error when trying to compile Atlas (from cvs)
Preferences.cxx: In member function ‘bool
Preferences::_loadPreferences(int, char**)’:
Preferences.cxx:346: error: ‘optreset’ was not declared in this scope
Any ideas anyone?
LeeE
On Wednesday 31 October 2007 19:40, Durk Talsma wrote:
On Wednesday 31 October 2007 20:12, leee wrote:
Hi all,
I'm getting the following error when trying to compile Atlas (from
cvs)
Preferences.cxx: In member function ‘bool
Preferences::_loadPreferences(int, char
On Wednesday 31 October 2007 20:44, leee wrote:
[snip...]
Ah... looks like Atlas doesn't compile against FG 0.9.11 yet anyway and
I'm using cvs SimGear/FG, so that is probably the problem.
I'll take this to the Atlas list, when I get the subscription
confirmation.
Thanks for your help Durk
in that respect it
would be in good hands. Has MS FSX actually been released yet?
LeeE
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events
sorted out in cvs eventually.
Thanks for your help.
LeeE
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX
and thermals,
so these are also consistant over MP.
LeeE
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX
There's no reason why it shouldn't run on the same box as FG - it could
communicate via loopback or localhost. Ideally, FG would automatically
start a local process to use if a net or lan server isn't specified.
LeeE
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 20:17, Heiko Schulz wrote:
hmmm... good idea
the MPMap, so that's a start.
Anders is hard at work extending this into a co-pilot facility -
watch this space. Meanwhile - if you are on MP we're aboard and
watching you :-).
Regards
Vivian
Nice work:)
LeeE
-
This SF.net
but that means we're back to
not being able to access the yaw value.
Co-incidentally, the original hard-coded hud still shows yaw but the
newer xml hud does not - perhaps this is not too surprising if it's
trying to use yaw-deg.
Anyone know what's going on?
LeeE
On Thursday 22 November 2007 12:03, John Denker wrote:
On 11/22/2007 04:58 AM, LeeE wrote:
I've slowly been fixing the aircraft I've done that have been
broken by updates in the FG code and I've noticed that we no longer
seem to have access to the aircraft yaw in the property tree.
When
being produced and
it is not an FDM issue about producing the data but about how the data
already being successfully produced is being handled and routed, and
eventually being exposed in the property-tree.
Oh yeah - and what it's going to be called ;-)
LeeE
seemed to be from
ATC.
LeeE
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01
is that it encroaches on our 'turf', it
will be proprietary in format and it will be tied to the MS platforms
and licencing. Hopefully though, it will be irrelevant to FG.
LeeE
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux
unassigned or
not appropriate for the B-52). On my uk keyboard they're all
conveniently close together on the left-hand side of the k/b and it's
easy enough to hold down the Ctrl key with the little finger and
operate the '\' and 'z' keys with the other fingers.
LeeE
On Thursday 29 November 2007 12:29, gerard robin wrote:
On jeu 29 novembre 2007, AnMaster wrote:
LeeE wrote:
Re the secondary flight controls, we need to allow for separate
ground steering and rudder control, in addition to differential
braking - with tandem and quadracycle landing
like to refine the 3d model geometry and then unify the two
versions (perhaps it will only need different skins), incorporating all
the development that Vivian has done...
...or Vivian might decide to do it before I do :)
Ok with you Vivian?
LeeE
and atm they are the most significant users of
FG:)
LeeE
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream. Let it simplify
.
Other than that, I guess whoever wants to start first just needs to let
the other know for last-minute checks and so that any plans can be
merged.
I don't foresee any real problems.
LeeE
-
SF.Net email is sponsored
could be intercepted and
modified before being passed on to the control surfaces. This would be
highly desirable for fbw aircraft - for the SU-37 I had to duplicate
most of the control inputs in the YASim config so that I could
optionally intercept them and modify them using nasal.
LeeE
revising) but it seems to work ok.
LeeE
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future
anyone but that's the facts.
LeeE
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy
systems etc. and then just state
the level of development for each of those areas.
LeeE
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about
just a test
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
also expect an even greater ratio between the aileron hstab lift
drag values. The hstab should probably have a camber value too,
considering it's design.
LeeE
bleriot-XI-yasim.tar.gz
Description: application/tgz
-
SF.Net
. The hstab should probably have a camber value too,
considering it's design.
LeeE
bleriot-XI-yasim.tar.gz
Description: application/tgz
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place
patches of it missing on the horizon, even at low level.
LeeE
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services
for just about anything Open Source.
http
seemed to be oscillating very quickly up to the
first decimal place.
I don't know if this happens with all filter types - all the ones
I've been using are noise-spike types.
LeeE
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out
but I think he's no longer working
on FG, at least until he finishes his studies. I'm not sure of the
fdm status for the B-29 either - I seem to recall he was having
problems with a YASim config for it but I don't know if he got the
JSBSim fdm working.
LeeE
On Tuesday 18 December 2007 22:52, Tiago Gusmão wrote:
LeeE wrote:
Hi all,
I've noticed recently that after re-loading an autopilot the
filters that are being used seem to be getting a bit
'confused'. I spotted it when I was comparing the unfiltered
input with the filtered output
On Wednesday 19 December 2007 12:56, Tiago Gusmão wrote:
LeeE wrote:
On Tuesday 18 December 2007 22:52, Tiago Gusmão wrote:
LeeE wrote:
Hi all,
I've noticed recently that after re-loading an autopilot the
filters that are being used seem to be getting a bit
'confused'. I spotted
1 - 100 of 330 matches
Mail list logo
