On Wednesday 09 January 2008 00:24, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008, at 7:15 PM, LeeE wrote:
On Monday 07 January 2008 22:28, Curtis Olson wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 3:51 PM, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
If we keep the same triangle budget for every tile, we will
have sparse data and
On Jan 8, 2008 1:22 AM, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
I was thinking about the parameter we pass to Terra to simplify the
initial
grid. IIRC, this parameter is always the same, leaving all *.arr.gz files
with
the same number of vertices.
Yes, that's a good point, and something definitely to
On Jan 7, 2008, at 7:15 PM, LeeE wrote:
On Monday 07 January 2008 22:28, Curtis Olson wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 3:51 PM, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
If we keep the same triangle budget for every tile, we will
have sparse data and
features at the equator and much more than what is really
needed at
Hi again!
Thinking a bit more about it, the grid could be made consistent if we
would define that 180W and 180E are tile borders instead of enforcing
the Greenwich Meridian to be a tile border at all ranges of latitude.
Find attached my proposed patch.
That would change the arrangement of tiles
On Jan 7, 2008 5:10 AM, Ralf Gerlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thinking a bit more about it, the grid could be made consistent if we
would define that 180W and 180E are tile borders instead of enforcing
the Greenwich Meridian to be a tile border at all ranges of latitude.
Find attached my
Selon Curtis Olson :
I've been wondering about dispensing with the variable subdivision scheme
and just having a fixed number of divisions per 1 degree of longitude.
Perhaps having 4 subdivisions. This would double the tile width at the
equator, but would preserve the same tile widths in the
On Jan 7, 2008 3:51 PM, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
If we keep the same triangle budget for every tile, we will have sparse
data and
features at the equator and much more than what is really needed at the
poles,
just because the area covered by each tile will vary greatly (
proportional to
On Monday 07 January 2008 22:28, Curtis Olson wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 3:51 PM, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
If we keep the same triangle budget for every tile, we will
have sparse data and
features at the equator and much more than what is really
needed at the poles,
just because the area
Selon Curtis Olson :
On Jan 7, 2008 3:51 PM, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
If we keep the same triangle budget for every tile, we will have sparse
data and
features at the equator and much more than what is really needed at the
poles,
just because the area covered by each tile will vary
9 matches
Mail list logo
