Re: [Flightgear-devel] about the carrier used in scenario

2008-07-30 Thread Vivian Meazza
jean pellotier wrote we did a scenario that use the carrier type to make an arresting cable with a flols working, at LFRJ airport (Landivisiau, France), but if we check the turn to wind button the cable and the flols are moving, considered like a normal carrier. Is there a way to make it

Re: [Flightgear-devel] about the carrier used in scenario

2008-07-30 Thread Vivian Meazza
I wrote jean pellotier wrote we did a scenario that use the carrier type to make an arresting cable with a flols working, at LFRJ airport (Landivisiau, France), but if we check the turn to wind button the cable and the flols are moving, considered like a normal carrier. Is there a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] about the carrier used in scenario

2008-07-30 Thread Vivian Meazza
I wrote jean pellotier wrote we did a scenario that use the carrier type to make an arresting cable with a flols working, at LFRJ airport (Landivisiau, France), but if we check the turn to wind button the cable and the flols are moving, considered like a normal carrier. Is

Re: [Flightgear-devel] about the carrier used in scenario

2008-07-30 Thread jean pellotier
Vivian Meazza a écrit : OK - Wave Off Lights 71, 72 were in the wrong position, as were 61, 62, which confused me. Fixed now in cvs - please check that the problem is solved for you. now 71 and 72 are in the right place, but 61 and 62 are in the same place as 51 and 52, so there's

Re: [Flightgear-devel] about the carrier used in scenario

2008-07-30 Thread Vivian Meazza
jean pellotier wrote Vivian Meazza a écrit : OK - Wave Off Lights 71, 72 were in the wrong position, as were 61, 62, which confused me. Fixed now in cvs - please check that the problem is solved for you. now 71 and 72 are in the right place, but 61 and 62 are in the same place

Re: [Flightgear-devel] about the carrier used in scenario

2008-07-30 Thread jean pellotier
Vivian Meazza a écrit : So they are - fixed in cvs (I hope) - try again that's ok for me, thanks. jano - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based

Re: [Flightgear-devel] about the carrier used in scenario

2008-07-30 Thread Vivian Meazza
jean pellotier wrote Vivian Meazza a écrit : So they are - fixed in cvs (I hope) - try again that's ok for me, thanks. Glad that we've fixed that - it must have been that way for several years. But what is the real issue with the demo? I couldn't get it to work here - doesn't it need

Re: [Flightgear-devel] about the carrier used in scenario

2008-07-30 Thread jean pellotier
Vivian Meazza a écrit : Glad that we've fixed that - it must have been that way for several years. But what is the real issue with the demo? I couldn't get it to work here - doesn't it need the model as well? oh sorry, i didn't gave you all needed to do it working, here's what's

[Flightgear-devel] about the carrier used in scenario

2008-07-29 Thread jean pellotier
hi all we did a scenario that use the carrier type to make an arresting cable with a flols working, at LFRJ airport (Landivisiau, France), but if we check the turn to wind button the cable and the flols are moving, considered like a normal carrier. Is there a way to make it fix relative to