Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-commitlogs] FlightGear branch,

2012-09-07 Thread Clement de l'Hamaide

Hi all,

I'm the author of the bug report #858. Big thanks to ThrostenB to solved it.

About 3D models loading, the change has been explained by Mathias here : 
http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg36498.html
After this changes I have reported a problem here : 
http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg36507.html
Jon Stockill has confirmed the same behavior for him.
The end of the conversation (last message by me) still waiting a response/fix.

I'm absolutely not here to say the bug is not yet solved !, absolutely not. 
I'm just here to help you to remember/avoid to search the corresponding 
conversation about this bug.

Cheers,
Clément
  --
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-commitlogs] FlightGear branch,

2012-09-07 Thread HB-GRAL
Am 07.09.12 20:51, schrieb Clement de l'Hamaide:

 Hi all,

 I'm the author of the bug report #858. Big thanks to ThrostenB to solved it.

 About 3D models loading, the change has been explained by Mathias here : 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg36498.html
 After this changes I have reported a problem here : 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg36507.html
 Jon Stockill has confirmed the same behavior for him.
 The end of the conversation (last message by me) still waiting a response/fix.

 I'm absolutely not here to say the bug is not yet solved !, absolutely not. 
 I'm just here to help you to remember/avoid to search the corresponding 
 conversation about this bug.

 Cheers,
 Clément
   

Maybe #758 could be merged into #858 ?

-Yves


--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-commitlogs] FlightGear branch,

2012-09-07 Thread Martin Spott
James Turner wrote:
 On 6 Sep 2012, at 09:54, Martin Spott wrote:

 _But_ the same model is already available in the Scenery path:
 
 jive: 10:40:08 ~ ls -l 
 /export/share/FGScenery/Test/Models/Misc/entrepotblanc-ba.xml
 -rw-r--r-- 1 martin user 946  6. Okt 2011  
 /export/share/FGScenery/Test/Models/Misc/entrepotblanc-ba.xml
 
 
 To me this looks like FlightGear is searching the wrong path.  For now
 I can't tell if it's faulty by design - I vaguely remember some
 confusion several months ago about how FG would be supposed to search
 3D models - or if it's caused by a recent change.
 
 Yep that's a bug. I know 'how' to fix both this issue, and the
 --fg-aicraft one, but I need Mathias to help me understand why he
 couldn't use the SGModelLib::findDataFile method in his code.

I'd like to remind that the *planned* behaviour was still to use
Objects and Models from the first item in the Scenery path where a
Terrain tile is found.  If no Objects and/or Models are available in
this path item, FlightGear should fall back to the Base Package for
Models and/or Objects.

I know there are voices advertizing a different behaviour, anyhow I
think the value of a consistent and *predictable* schema outweighs
personal preferences of some individuals.

Cheers,
Martin.
-- 
 Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--

--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-commitlogs] FlightGear branch,

2012-09-06 Thread Martin Spott
ThorstenB wrote:

 I checked commit comments, but couldn't find anything related. Checked a 
 bit closer now: my best _guess_ is, it's related to the following 
 simgear change:
 
 commit f1201eaebc3fbb8964e06b7ef158fd34a12901aa
 Author: Mathias Froehlich
 Date:   Sat Aug 25 08:43:12 2012 +0200

 scene: Reorganize stg loading.

While you're at it, I'd like to mention that there's still another
place in need of more consistency, as FlightGear should be able to load
Scenery 3D models from the respective Scenery directory, but apparently
that's not always the case.
I've set:

jive: 10:39:16 ~ echo $FG_SCENERY
/export/share/FGScenery/Test


Now when I start FlightGear, I'm getting warnings of this sort:

/home/martin/SCM/FlightGear/fgdata/Models/Misc/entrepotblanc-ba.xml: Use of 
global in material animation is no longer supported.


_But_ the same model is already available in the Scenery path:

jive: 10:40:08 ~ ls -l 
/export/share/FGScenery/Test/Models/Misc/entrepotblanc-ba.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 martin user 946  6. Okt 2011  
/export/share/FGScenery/Test/Models/Misc/entrepotblanc-ba.xml


To me this looks like FlightGear is searching the wrong path.  For now
I can't tell if it's faulty by design - I vaguely remember some
confusion several months ago about how FG would be supposed to search
3D models - or if it's caused by a recent change.

Cheers,
Martin.
-- 
 Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--

--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-commitlogs] FlightGear branch,

2012-09-06 Thread James Turner

On 6 Sep 2012, at 09:54, Martin Spott wrote:

 _But_ the same model is already available in the Scenery path:
 
 jive: 10:40:08 ~ ls -l 
 /export/share/FGScenery/Test/Models/Misc/entrepotblanc-ba.xml
 -rw-r--r-- 1 martin user 946  6. Okt 2011  
 /export/share/FGScenery/Test/Models/Misc/entrepotblanc-ba.xml
 
 
 To me this looks like FlightGear is searching the wrong path.  For now
 I can't tell if it's faulty by design - I vaguely remember some
 confusion several months ago about how FG would be supposed to search
 3D models - or if it's caused by a recent change.

Yep that's a bug. I know 'how' to fix both this issue, and the --fg-aicraft 
one, but I need Mathias to help me understand why he couldn't use the 
SGModelLib::findDataFile method in his code.

I'm guessing either I need to teach the OSG layer about the extra search paths 
(but I'm sure there was a reason I avoided that approach, when originally 
adding --fg-aircraft support), OR we need to extend SGModelLib::findDataFile so 
we can switch back to using it everywhere.

Mathias: poke

James

--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-commitlogs] FlightGear branch, next, updated. 1dbc2c83e5c0514b1a51eb0c2aee9f6dbe577492

2012-09-05 Thread James Turner

On 4 Sep 2012, at 23:09, Flightgear-commitlogs wrote:

 commit 6745d27691039e2ce477b2e823dbae6c59bc5d00
 Author: ThorstenB
 Date:   Tue Sep 4 23:57:25 2012 +0200
 
#858: Fix loading issue with aircraft models in --fg-aircraft directories
Something after FG 2.8.0 has broken loading aircraft models from
--fg-aircraft directories. Issue is fixed by resolving the aircraft path
in FGAircraftModel (though this module itself hasn't changed and things
were working before...).

I'm very suspicious of this - I don't think there's been any post 2.8 commit 
that could change such a core behaviour. (I don't read every single commit in 
detail, but I look at the summaries)

The change is certainly valid, but I'd be much happier knowing why it worked 
before and what broke it. I'll take a quick look myself but any help would be 
appreciated.

James


--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-commitlogs] FlightGear branch, next, updated. 1dbc2c83e5c0514b1a51eb0c2aee9f6dbe577492

2012-09-05 Thread Alan Teeder
I can confirm that it (--fg-aircraft directories)was broken,and was about to 
investigate further when ThorstenB made it work again. Thanks.

I think that the bug appeared very recently, perhaps within the last 2 
weeks, but cannot be 100% sure when

Alan

-Original Message- 
From: James Turner
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 9:00 AM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-commitlogs] FlightGear branch, 
next, updated. 1dbc2c83e5c0514b1a51eb0c2aee9f6dbe577492


On 4 Sep 2012, at 23:09, Flightgear-commitlogs wrote:

 commit 6745d27691039e2ce477b2e823dbae6c59bc5d00
 Author: ThorstenB
 Date:   Tue Sep 4 23:57:25 2012 +0200

#858: Fix loading issue with aircraft models in --fg-aircraft 
 directories
Something after FG 2.8.0 has broken loading aircraft models from
--fg-aircraft directories. Issue is fixed by resolving the aircraft 
 path
in FGAircraftModel (though this module itself hasn't changed and things
were working before...).

I'm very suspicious of this - I don't think there's been any post 2.8 commit 
that could change such a core behaviour. (I don't read every single commit 
in detail, but I look at the summaries)

The change is certainly valid, but I'd be much happier knowing why it worked 
before and what broke it. I'll take a quick look myself but any help would 
be appreciated.

James


--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel 


--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-commitlogs] FlightGear branch, next, updated. 1dbc2c83e5c0514b1a51eb0c2aee9f6dbe577492

2012-09-05 Thread ThorstenB
 I'm very suspicious of this - I don't think there's been any post 2.8 commit
 that could change such a core behaviour. (I don't read every single commit in
 detail, but I look at the summaries)

 The change is certainly valid, but I'd be much happier knowing why it worked
 before and what broke it. I'll take a quick look myself but any help would be
 appreciated.

I checked commit comments, but couldn't find anything related. Checked a 
bit closer now: my best _guess_ is, it's related to the following 
simgear change:

 commit f1201eaebc3fbb8964e06b7ef158fd34a12901aa
 Author: Mathias Froehlich
 Date:   Sat Aug 25 08:43:12 2012 +0200

 scene: Reorganize stg loading.


Specifically, the diff contains:

 SGReaderWriterXML::readNode(const std::string fileName,
  {
 +std::string fileName = osgDB::findDataFile(name, options);
 +
  osg::Node *result=0;
  try {
  SGPath p = SGModelLib::findDataFile(fileName);

The XML reader relies on osgDB to resolve paths now. If 
osgDB::findDataFile cannot find the file, it returns , in which case 
SGModelLib::findDataFile cannot search any additional directories.
So, maybe osgDB::findDataFile doesn't know about extra directories, 
while SGModelLib::findDataFile was fg-aircraft aware. Not sure why the 
change was applied in the first place.

Again, I haven't tested - it just looks plausible and somehow related. 
Maybe you or Mathias can investigate if that's what triggered it and 
whether anything else may still be broken now.

cheers,
Thorsten

--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-commitlogs] FlightGear branch, next, updated. 1dbc2c83e5c0514b1a51eb0c2aee9f6dbe577492

2012-09-05 Thread James Turner

On 5 Sep 2012, at 21:13, ThorstenB wrote:

 The XML reader relies on osgDB to resolve paths now. If 
 osgDB::findDataFile cannot find the file, it returns , in which case 
 SGModelLib::findDataFile cannot search any additional directories.
 So, maybe osgDB::findDataFile doesn't know about extra directories, 
 while SGModelLib::findDataFile was fg-aircraft aware. Not sure why the 
 change was applied in the first place.

Ah, that's exactly it - we need to use the SGModelLib to get the additional 
paths searched!

Mathias, can you explain what was the problem here which required you to use 
the plain OSG version? My version is simply a wrapper which tries the 
aircraft-dir paths (and soon, some other data directories!) before the default 
osg paths.

James


--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-commitlogs] FlightGear branch, next, updated. 26664aaff0e2f97db916909218d849b51636ccc0

2012-08-29 Thread James Turner

On 29 Aug 2012, at 06:09, Flightgear-commitlogs wrote:

 - Log -
 commit 26664aaff0e2f97db916909218d849b51636ccc0
 Author: Mathias Froehlich
 Date:   Mon Aug 27 20:51:16 2012 +0200
 
Push SGMaterial use into these classes that need it.

Nice work Mathias - much better decoupling of the AIModels from the scene. 
Thank you.

James


--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-commitlogs] FlightGear branch, next, updated. 26664aaff0e2f97db916909218d849b51636ccc0

2012-08-29 Thread Mathias Fröhlich

Hi,

On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 09:08:44 James Turner wrote:
 Nice work Mathias - much better decoupling of the AIModels from the scene.
 Thank you.
Thanks, it was independent of what you started. It just originates from moving 
the bvh stuff to simgear core which could be solved like that ...

Greetings

Mathias

--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-commitlogs] FlightGear branch, next,

2012-06-28 Thread Martin Spott
Hi Curt,

Flightgear-commitlogs wrote:

 diff --git a/package/make-base-package.noarch.sh 
 b/package/make-base-package.noarch.sh
 index bec5472..63e467c 100755
 --- a/package/make-base-package.noarch.sh
 +++ b/package/make-base-package.noarch.sh
 @@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ tar \
data/materials.dtd \
data/materials.xml \
data/mice.xml \
 +   data/Materials \
 +   data/Models \
data/Models \
data/MP \
data/N* \

Did you really mean to include the Models directory twice ?

Cheers,
Martin.
-- 
 Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--

--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-commitlogs] FlightGear branch, next,

2012-05-05 Thread Martin Spott
Flightgear-commitlogs wrote:
 The branch, next has been updated
 
 - Log -
 commit b9260f543b8dae06c6a80b12c930e367805f34c4
 Author: ThorstenB
 Date:   Sat May 5 01:08:20 2012 +0200
 
Ganael Laplanche: fix include dependencies for FreeBSD support

Cool !  I'm checking the FreeBSD port almost every week, but until
recently it's still been at 2.4, looks like this will change soon  :-)

Cheers,
Martin.
-- 
 Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--

--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-commitlogs] FlightGear branch, next,

2012-05-05 Thread James Turner

On 5 May 2012, at 09:00, Martin Spott wrote:

   Ganael Laplanche: fix include dependencies for FreeBSD support
 
 Cool !  I'm checking the FreeBSD port almost every week, but until
 recently it's still been at 2.4, looks like this will change soon  :-)

Yep, if any CMake assistance is required, please just ask.

James


--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-commitlogs] FlightGear branch,

2012-05-05 Thread Martin Spott
James Turner wrote:
 
 On 5 May 2012, at 09:00, Martin Spott wrote:
 
   Ganael Laplanche: fix include dependencies for FreeBSD support
 
 Cool !  I'm checking the FreeBSD port almost every week, but until
 recently it's still been at 2.4, looks like this will change soon  :-)
 
 Yep, if any CMake assistance is required, please just ask.

Ganael Laplanche is the maintainer of the FlightGear FreeBSD port,
therefore I suspect the job to be completed now that he submits fixes
upstream  ;-)

Apparently it is:

  
http://www.freshports.org/commit.php?files=yesmessage_id=201204271228.q3rcsnzi032...@repoman.freebsd.org

Cheers,
Martin.
-- 
 Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--

--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-commitlogs] FlightGear branch, next, updated. 23cdb0d3020f5beca54bb72736163c88a520cdb2

2012-01-04 Thread James Turner

On 3 Jan 2012, at 23:09, Flightgear-commitlogs wrote:

#561: keep magnetic heading within limits when mag-variation is negative
Thanks to Hyde!
 

   double magheading;
   magheading = fgGetDouble(/orientation/heading-deg) - getMagVar();
 -  if (magheading  0) magheading += 360;
 +  if (magheading = 0) magheading += 360;
 +  else if (magheading  360) magheading -= 360;
   return magheading;
 }

Please use one of the two helpers for this - partly because they're more 
compact to write, but also because they're easier to search for when checking 
for such issues.

Either:
SG_NORMALIZE_RANGE(magheading, 0.0, 360.0);

Or:
return SGMiscd::normalizePeriodic(0.0, 360.0, magheader );

Regards,
James


--
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual 
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure 
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-commitlogs] FlightGear branch, next,

2011-11-12 Thread Martin Spott
Flightgear-commitlogs wrote:

 commit 0905b4f36781c057b0c17b5af2c9ccfd72cf0fcd
 Author: Durk Talsma
 Date:   Sat Nov 12 18:40:23 2011 +0100
 
Fixing an age old bug. AIAircraft arriving on an airport never
 received a proper gateId, causing them to taxi to the end of the
 world and beyond.

Is this the one which was causing the 'rabbits' at EHLE ?

Martin.
-- 
 Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--

--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-commitlogs] FlightGear branch, next,

2011-11-12 Thread Durk Talsma
 
 Is this the one which was causing the 'rabbits' at EHLE ?
 

Nope, this one was just causing aircraft that landed at an airport without a 
ground network to taxi to the end of the world (or better the beginning: 
lat/lon 0.00; 0.00). What you're referring to is -I assume- the incrorrect 
ground offset in the cessna. That isn't really a bug in the true sense of the 
word. Just inaccurate data.

Cheers,
Durk


--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-commitlogs] FlightGear branch, next, updated. b16338598afd886e8aed8da2da5085d65effbc28

2011-10-12 Thread James Turner

On 11 Oct 2011, at 21:09, Flightgear-commitlogs wrote:

Reduce AI/MP lags when removing models
Move load of removing OSG objects to the OSG pager thread


Excellent, nice work Thorsten.

(Thread-safety for the win :)

James


--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-commitlogs] FlightGear branch, next, updated. 07d430c129e6214c06df994b42bb997b05dfbd31

2010-12-29 Thread James Turner

On 29 Dec 2010, at 19:14, Flightgear-commitlogs wrote:

More fixes to the ATCDCL  ATC compilation
 
Rename ATC/atis.[ch]xx to ATC/atis_mgr.[ch]xx, to avoid confusingly
having 2 atis.cxx and 2 atis.hxx in the source tree.  Also fix a copy
and paste error in src/ATCDCL/CMakeLists.txt.

While it's lovely that you (Dave Luff) are keeping the CMakeFiles in sync, the 
MSVC build currently uses hand-rolled projects of Fred's, which need to be 
updated by hand (but this is trivial to do, just open up the VC90 ones in a 
text editor). (Don't worry about the VC100 projects, they are tricky to hand 
edit unfortunately - Hudson uses VS2008, aka VC90)

(we might use CMake for the MSVC builds in the future, but the CMake files need 
to mature quite a bit first)

James

--
Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers
to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, 
should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database 
without downtime or disruption
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-commitlogs] FlightGear branch, next, updated. d66903e9ad63b91182ccc25d9bb82f18f8dd98b6

2010-11-30 Thread James Turner

On 30 Nov 2010, at 13:14, Flightgear-commitlogs wrote:

 commit c44948041b9356c9d16acc2d888de109bf7866e7
 Author: Erik Hofman
 Date:   Mon Nov 29 09:57:45 2010 +0100
 
PAtch by Andreas Gaeb to eliminate NaN's in the location code

Erik, can you talk a little about what this patch fixes? I can read the 
description, and it sounds really great, but it seems very fortunate that a 
patch should appear for the exact problem we're having in FlightGear, at this 
time. Am I hoping for too much, based upon the description?

James

--
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App  Earn a Chance To Win $500!
Tap into the largest installed PC base  get more eyes on your game by
optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the
Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-commitlogs] FlightGear branch, next, updated. d66903e9ad63b91182ccc25d9bb82f18f8dd98b6

2010-11-30 Thread Erik Hofman
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 14:03 +, James Turner wrote:
 On 30 Nov 2010, at 13:14, Flightgear-commitlogs wrote:
 PAtch by Andreas Gaeb to eliminate NaN's in the location code
 
 Erik, can you talk a little about what this patch fixes? I can read the 
 description, and it sounds really great, but it seems very fortunate that a 
 patch should appear for the exact problem we're having in FlightGear, at this 
 time. Am I hoping for too much, based upon the description?
Form the JSBSim developers list:

 
 recently I've run into some floating point exceptions.  Tracing them
 down, I found that FGLocation could produce them.  This is due to the
 derived values not being initialized.  If the copy constructor or
 operator= are called, they copy over the uninitialized garbage in the
 derived values -- which on my system happens to evaluate to NaN, thus
 causing FPEs.

Coincidentally it was posted the same day someone mentioned the startup
'crash' of the C172p. I was hoping it might solve it but was (and still
am) skeptical it does. Due to the lack of feedback so far I don't know
for certain either.

Erik


--
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App  Earn a Chance To Win $500!
Tap into the largest installed PC base  get more eyes on your game by
optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the
Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel