Re: [Flightgear-devel] Adds on FlightGear.org

2013-03-02 Thread Curtis Olson
I realize this is not a satisfactory response for some people, but I have added downloadmanagerapp.com to the list of blocked sites. Thanks, Curt. On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Anders Gidenstam anders-...@gidenstam.orgwrote: On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Gijs de Rooy wrote: Curt, are you there?

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Adds on FlightGear.org

2013-03-01 Thread Gijs de Rooy
Curt, are you there? Repeating the links in case you missed them: http://www.flightsim.com/vbfs/content.php?13546-FlightGear-v2-10-Is-Released#comments http://www.flightsim.com/vbfs/showthread.php?260718-FlightGear-2-10-is-now-available-!p=1747315#post1747315 Thanks! Gijs

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Adds on FlightGear.org

2013-03-01 Thread Clement de l'Hamaide
Anders Gidenstam wrote : If it is not possible to be more restrictive on what ads to show (and even if that can be done I'm sure the guys paying for these sort of ads would do their best to by-pass any such restriction) then IMO the ads should go. Maybe the text ads could stay but the big

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Adds on FlightGear.org

2013-02-23 Thread Erik Hofman
On 02/23/2013 11:13 AM, Gijs de Rooy wrote: Hi all, I won't ask for the adds to be removed (apparently that is not possible), but I do want to bring the result of that decision under your attention. Is this really what we want? One quick option would be to move the navigation bar below the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Adds on FlightGear.org

2013-02-23 Thread Durk Talsma
Hi Gijs, et al., Slowly coming back to FlightGear land, now that my deadline is met. :-) Yes, I think that this is undesirable. Having adds inside the content area of a website is usually considered to be poor design, from a usability perspective. I don't mind if we have some adds on the top,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Adds on FlightGear.org

2013-02-23 Thread Roland Haeder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/23/2013 11:26 AM, Durk Talsma wrote: Hi Gijs, et al., Slowly coming back to FlightGear land, now that my deadline is met. :-) Yes, I think that this is undesirable. Having adds inside the content area of a website is usually considered

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Adds on FlightGear.org

2013-02-23 Thread Roland Haeder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sorry for empty message. Here it is. :) Here is now an alternative tracker (I also track my FGFS-related torrents to the original + in addition to my tracker) for all BitTorrent download: http://flightgear.mxchange.org:23456/ Just click on the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Adds on FlightGear.org

2013-02-23 Thread Olivier
Hi Gijs, De : Gijs de Rooy gijsr...@hotmail.com Envoyé le : Samedi 23 février 2013 11h13 I won't ask for the adds to be removed (apparently that is not possible), but I do want to bring the result of that decision under your attention. Is this really what

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Adds on FlightGear.org

2013-02-23 Thread Roland Haeder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/23/2013 03:50 PM, Olivier wrote: Hi Gijs, *De :* Gijs de Rooy gijsr...@hotmail.com *Envoyé le :* Samedi 23 février 2013 11h13 ** I won't ask for the adds to be