Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS - Frame Rates under Windows XP - plus movie comments AJ's Car

2008-04-04 Thread Forums Virgin Net
Dear Vivian, Your figures sound about right as I also get very frustrated with this also, in fact when I am filming making the movies I have found something interesting! When I use mibs for example and set it on a fixed heading to do straight in line pan scans for panoramic

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS - Frame Rates under Windows XP

2008-04-02 Thread Durk Talsma
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 22:39, Vivian Meazza wrote: So I conclude that: 1. There is a problem with replay, 2. MinGW has about the same performance gap between OSG and plib on XP as gcc does on Linux. 3. MinGW performance is probably as good as it gets. 4. Either MSVC8 doesn't compile such

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS - Frame Rates under Windows XP

2008-04-02 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Quoting Durk Talsma : On Tuesday 01 April 2008 22:39, Vivian Meazza wrote: So I conclude that: 1. There is a problem with replay, 2. MinGW has about the same performance gap between OSG and plib on XP as gcc does on Linux. 3. MinGW performance is probably as good as it gets. 4.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS - Frame Rates under Windows XP

2008-04-02 Thread Durk Talsma
On Wednesday 02 April 2008 12:14, Frederic Bouvier wrote: According to this chart, it seems you are right : http://cvs.flightgear.org/cgi-bin/viewvc/viewvc.cgi/source/src/Aircraft/rep lay.cxx?view=graphsortby=filepathrev=PRE_OSG_PLIB_20061029 -Fred Okay, I've just committed the port from

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS - Frame Rates under Windows XP

2008-04-01 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Selon Vivian Meazza : CoreDuo 2,6 Ghz and a Gainward 8800GT. Not surprised it runs well!!! In particular I think the CoreDuo does threading better than the P4. In case you haven't noticed, the 7600gs is coping easily with the output from FG-OSG - that's why the frame rates didn't increase.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS - Frame Rates under Windows XP

2008-04-01 Thread Tim Moore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Heiko Schulz wrote: | | AND, with Linux and the same Graphics Card 7800 GS | 512 MB, i can notice the | same decrease of performance from FG-PLIB to FG-OSG | , | I ever had about 20% less performance with OSG. | | I am running FG on AMD ATHLON

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS - Frame Rates under Windows XP

2008-04-01 Thread LeeE
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 07:52, Frederic Bouvier wrote: Selon Vivian Meazza : CoreDuo 2,6 Ghz and a Gainward 8800GT. Not surprised it runs well!!! In particular I think the CoreDuo does threading better than the P4. In case you haven't noticed, the 7600gs is coping easily with the output

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS - Frame Rates under Windows XP

2008-04-01 Thread Heiko Schulz
--- Frederic Bouvier [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Selon Vivian Meazza : CoreDuo 2,6 Ghz and a Gainward 8800GT. Not surprised it runs well!!! In particular I think the CoreDuo does threading better than the P4. In case you haven't noticed, the 7600gs is coping easily with the output

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS - Frame Rates under Windows XP

2008-04-01 Thread LeeE
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 13:10, Anders Gidenstam wrote: On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, LeeE wrote: Hmm... [looks at watch and wonders if it's time to post another missive about the _need_ for a redesign of FG to run on MPP systems as it gets ever clearer that significant increases in computing

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS - Frame Rates under Windows XP

2008-04-01 Thread Maik Justus
Hi Frederic Bouvier schrieb am 01.04.2008 08:52: I have a Core2 Duo 2.66 ( E6600 ) and a 7600GT. I always saw the greatest fps increase after upgrading CPU and was disappointed by several GPU-only upgrade. All I can tell is that with the Seahawk, at KSFO, I have 75hz steady ( with vsync on )

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS - Frame Rates under Windows XP

2008-04-01 Thread Vivian Meazza
Tim Moore Sent: 01 April 2008 12:35 To: FlightGear developers discussions Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS - Frame Rates under Windows XP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Heiko Schulz wrote: | | AND, with Linux and the same Graphics Card 7800 GS | 512 MB, i can

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS - Frame Rates under Windows XP

2008-03-31 Thread Heiko Schulz
--- Vivian Meazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hi About 10 days ago I got fed up with low frame rates using OSG around KSFO, so I went out and bought the best nVidia AGP card that I could find - 7600gs with 512Mb of VRAM. I fitted it with great anticipation to my machine - P4

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS - Frame Rates under Windows XP

2008-03-31 Thread Vivian Meazza
Heiko Schulz wrote Sent: 31 March 2008 20:45 To: FlightGear developers discussions Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS - Frame Rates under Windows XP Vivian Meazza schrieb: Hi About 10 days ago I got fed up with low frame rates using OSG around KSFO, so I went out

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS - Frame Rates under Windows XP

2008-03-31 Thread gerard robin
On lun 31 mars 2008, Vivian Meazza wrote: SNIP Even on my old PC with a FX5200 OSG run very pretty at least. It is true that OSG is slower than plib- but the graphic is much better (exxept the 3D-clouds and the missing shadows)- please not another discussion about OSG vs Plib!

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS - Frame Rates under Windows XP

2008-03-31 Thread Heiko Schulz
AND, with Linux and the same Graphics Card 7800 GS 512 MB, i can notice the same decrease of performance from FG-PLIB to FG-OSG , I ever had about 20% less performance with OSG. I am running FG on AMD ATHLON 3200 (32 bit) with AGP mothercard. May be OSG is more accurate

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS - Frame Rates under Windows XP

2008-03-31 Thread Heiko Schulz
CoreDuo 2,6 Ghz and a Gainward 8800GT. Not surprised it runs well!!! If you read carefully, I said that even on my old pc there wasn't any trouble! In particular I think the CoreDuo does threading better than the P4. In case you haven't noticed, the 7600gs is coping easily with the output

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS - Frame Rates under Windows XP

2008-03-31 Thread Csaba Halász
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Vivian Meazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've tried both executables generated here using MSVC8, and Fred's pre-cooked binaries. So far as I can see the results are identical. Here is a mingw32 build made with gcc 4.3.0 if you want to give it a try: