Hi,
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 07:56:22 Durk Talsma wrote:
On Monday 05 November 2007 16:50, Csaba Halász wrote:
Yeah! How about setting up an mp-server feeding in real traffic? Or
even just AI? So that every client would see the same traffic.
Note: This is moving into a slightly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oliver Schroeder wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 07:56:22 Durk Talsma wrote:
On Monday 05 November 2007 16:50, Csaba Halász wrote:
Yeah! How about setting up an mp-server feeding in real traffic? Or
even just AI? So that every client
Carroll Barry wrote:
I don't have access to a live feed but I'm hoping to get a delayed
one
perhaps, in the same way as fboweb @ http://www.fboweb.com/ has.
Aviation Data Systems (who produce fboweb.com) are listed as a Class 1 ASDI
Direct subscriber on the ASDI website - so they have
Hi Stuart, Thomas, Oliver
Firstly thank-you to everyone so far, some good ideas have been put forward and
It is seeming more likely that this might work.
I don't have access to a live feed but I'm hoping to get a delayed one perhaps,
in the same way as fboweb @ http://www.fboweb.com/ has.
Tim Moore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oliver Schroeder wrote:
I really think, setting up a mp-client which feeds traffic is the right way
to
go. That way it does not matter, if the traffic is real or
artificial. And
best of all, flightgear itself does
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 09:25, Oliver Schroeder wrote:
I really think, setting up a mp-client which feeds traffic is the right way
to go. That way it does not matter, if the traffic is real or artificial.
And best of all, flightgear itself does not need any changes at all.
In fact, that
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 10:41, Tim Moore wrote:
I'd be a bit concerned about the performance implications of this approach.
If the intent is to run this program on the same machine as FlightGear,
then there will need to be a fair amount of tuning to make sure that the
real-time FlightGear
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 20:22, Durk Talsma wrote:
Assuming that AI aircraft behave in a reasonably sane fashion, you'd only
need to take care of elevation points across the runways and taxiways.
These data could be sampled straight from the flightgear scenery, and
perhaps stored locally on
On Nov 6, 2007 8:22 PM, Durk Talsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assuming that AI aircraft behave in a reasonably sane fashion, you'd only need
to take care of elevation points across the runways and taxiways. These data
could be sampled straight from the flightgear scenery, and perhaps stored
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 06:56, Durk Talsma wrote:
On Monday 05 November 2007 16:50, Csaba Halász wrote:
On 11/5/07, Heiko Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Though I can't help you, it sounds for me like a very
good feature for FlightGear! Real weather - real
traffic - would
hmmm... good idea for mp and network.
But it still costs money to have internet and maybe
some flightschools, which want to use FGFS don't want
this because.
I think there should be still a possibility to have
this all on one pc without network.
HHS
--- leee [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On
There's no reason why it shouldn't run on the same box as FG - it could
communicate via loopback or localhost. Ideally, FG would automatically
start a local process to use if a net or lan server isn't specified.
LeeE
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 20:17, Heiko Schulz wrote:
hmmm... good idea
I'm not so keen on computing and programming - so if
this works good, I don't see any problems!
--- LeeE [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
There's no reason why it shouldn't run on the same
box as FG - it could
communicate via loopback or localhost. Ideally, FG
would automatically
start a
I'm not so keen on computing and programming - so if
this works good, I don't see any problems!
--- LeeE [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
There's no reason why it shouldn't run on the same
box as FG - it could
communicate via loopback or localhost. Ideally, FG
would automatically
start a
Hi Barry,
I did a work to a Brazilian institute past year and the software to control
the aircraft, in fact control the flighgear simulator, exactly like your
project.
I did a C module that interacts with Telnet server of FlightGear and
controls the flight using the telnet properties/commands.
Hi,
Though I can't help you, it sounds for me like a very
good feature for FlightGear! Real weather - real
traffic - would be great!
HHS
--- Carroll Barry [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hello all,
I would like to use Flightgear to display real-time
air traffic. At the moment I am using
On 11/5/07, Heiko Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Though I can't help you, it sounds for me like a very
good feature for FlightGear! Real weather - real
traffic - would be great!
Yeah! How about setting up an mp-server feeding in real traffic? Or
even just AI? So that every client would
Am Montag 05 November 2007 schrieb Carroll Barry:
Hello all,
I would like to use Flightgear to display real-time air traffic. At the
moment I am using tracking data from this site:
http://www.fly.faa.gov/ASDI/asdi.html
What I would like to be able to do is to create and control aircraft
the replies,
Barry.
-Original Message-
From: Leidson Campos A. Ferreira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FlightGear developers discussions flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 12:32:26 -0300
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Programmatic control of AI traffic
Hi Barry,
I did
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for the reply. Would your solution allow me to manually control what
might be thousands or aircraft?
I haven't looked into the multiplayer protocol yet because I am just using the
standalone exe on my pc. Would I be correct in thinking that I would implement
the following:
Am Montag 05 November 2007 schrieb Carroll Barry:
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for the reply. Would your solution allow me to manually control
what might be thousands or aircraft?
I haven't looked into the multiplayer protocol yet because I am just using
the standalone exe on my pc. Would I be
--- Carroll Barry wrote:
Hello all,
I would like to use Flightgear to display real-time air traffic. At the
moment I am using tracking data from this site:
http://www.fly.faa.gov/ASDI/asdi.html
What I would like to be able to do is to create and control aircraft
programmatically from a
Csaba Halász wrote:
On 11/5/07, Heiko Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Though I can't help you, it sounds for me like a very
good feature for FlightGear! Real weather - real
traffic - would be great!
Yeah! How about setting up an mp-server feeding in real traffic? Or
even just AI? So
On Monday 05 November 2007 16:50, Csaba Halász wrote:
On 11/5/07, Heiko Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Though I can't help you, it sounds for me like a very
good feature for FlightGear! Real weather - real
traffic - would be great!
Yeah! How about setting up an mp-server feeding
24 matches
Mail list logo
