Erik Hofman wrote:
I've committed a protocol configuration file that reads the ACMS file
and puts its data in the property tree. Unfortunately there is no FDM
that reads the accelerations and translates them into world coordinates
so it's not very useful at the moment.
One way to handle this
Further testing (Windows 0.9.6 binaries, ATI Mobility Radeon 9700)
reveals that this problem seems only to occur where a moving object
passes between the panel and the viewer; in the case of the wing, where
the flaps are in the flaps up position (note, however, that you can
still see the artefact
Francisco Rinaldo wrote:
Sent: 20 October 2004 16:52
To: flightgear-users
Subject: RE: [Flightgear-users] Libraries containing aluinit
Hi, Vivian
Thank you
I´ve just compiled the program.In order to do that I had to extract
openal_cyg into /usr instead of into /usr/local. However I´ve had
Innis Cunningham wrote:
Also thanks to those involved in the speed increase.Havn't seen frame rates
over 100 fps since 9.1.
Has anybody really been able to achieve a framerate of *100* FPS ??
I am a bit surprised - what kind of hardware is/was involved,
cause in one (gaming) machine I am using a
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 02:25:27 +0200
Boris Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Innis Cunningham wrote:
Also thanks to those involved in the speed increase.Havn't seen frame
rates over 100 fps since 9.1.
Has anybody really been able to achieve a framerate of *100* FPS ??
I am a bit surprised -
One of the problems, as I pointed out earlier, is that the download size of
the base package is a bit on the huge size. Including all aircrafts into an
already big download will not be a good idea. So, the best option will still
be removing all the work-in-progress aircrafts from the base
Hi, all
Hi Vi
NowI have fgfs compiled in my system.The programs size is 6,23 MB after sritp *.Is this size ok?.SO, how canI make it running?
Regards
Francisco
PS There is somthing strange yet.I have to extract openal_cyg into /usr to make the program compiled
Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
On October 20, 2004 10:05 pm, Boris Koenig wrote:
Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
One of the problems, as I pointed out earlier, is that the download size
of the base package is a bit on the huge size.
fully agreed, that's something most people seem to complain about - on
the
