On 14.01.2011 18:38, Michael Sweet wrote: > On Jan 14, 2011, at 1:59 AM, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: >> There seem to have been quite a few posts direct to fltk.bugs recently >> by users unfamiliar with our ways... Some of these even seem to have >> been of some merit (so it's good that Matt reads them!) >> >> However, I still wonder why fltk-bugs is not just made "read only" so >> that only the STR stuff goes there, and forcing users and contributors >> to post to fltk.general or fltk.dev instead… > > I can certainly make fltk.bugs/fltk-bugs read-only. It'll mean some > changes in the bug system too (emails to fltk-bugs would need to be > posted to fltk.bugs directly, for example) but nothing we can't handle.
+1 with a reject message for mails to fltk-bugs, as suggested in your other post. Albrecht _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list fltk-dev@easysw.com http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
