Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2835:Fl_Widget::do_callback()should check callback_ for NULL

2012-05-03 Thread Albrecht Schlosser
On 02.05.2012 17:58, Michael Sweet wrote: I thought default_callback set some global state, too? IIRC fl_ask() and friends used it as part of the old forms compatibility layer??? Yup, they used (/past/ tense) Fl::readqueue(), but the default callback still queues events in this queue - and we

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2834: Make Fl_Help_Viewdraw() andhandle() public

2012-05-03 Thread Albrecht Schlosser
On 02.05.2012 17:50, Bill Spitzak wrote: For FLTK 3 I would recommend a new draw and handle that take a rectangle. The purpose is so a subclass can add a frame around the contents without kludging it by adjusting the widget's boundaries. This also has the advantage that you can make these

Re: [fltk.development] fltk3 currently NOT building on win32/mingw r9440

2012-05-03 Thread Albrecht Schlosser
On 03.05.2012 10:11, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: I can't check Jenkins from here (due to my ongoing inablility to sneak around the security firewall here at work...) to see what it says, but when I do a build here it dies with There's no MinGW build for FLTK 3 yet on

Re: [fltk.development] fltk3 currently NOT building on win32/mingw r9440

2012-05-03 Thread Matthias Melcher
On 03.05.2012, at 10:11, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: All, I can't check Jenkins from here (due to my ongoing inablility to sneak around the security firewall here at work...) to see what it says, but when I do a build here it dies with Is this peculiar to my

Re: [fltk.development] fltk3 currently NOT building on win32/mingw r9440

2012-05-03 Thread MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK)
I can't check Jenkins from here (due to my ongoing inablility to sneak around the security firewall here at work...) to see what it says, but when I do a build here it dies with There's no MinGW build for FLTK 3 yet on Jenkins, but it fails here with the same errors: OH! Good

Re: [fltk.development] fltk3 currently NOT building on win32/mingw r9440

2012-05-03 Thread Matthias Melcher
On 03.05.2012, at 11:11, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: I can't check Jenkins from here (due to my ongoing inablility to sneak around the security firewall here at work...) to see what it says, but when I do a build here it dies with There's no MinGW build for FLTK 3 yet

Re: [fltk.development] fltk3 currently NOT building on win32/mingw r9440

2012-05-03 Thread Matthias Melcher
On 03.05.2012, at 11:11, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: I can't check Jenkins from here (due to my ongoing inablility to sneak around the security firewall here at work...) to see what it says, but when I do a build here it dies with There's no MinGW build for FLTK 3 yet

Re: [fltk.development] fltk3 currently NOT building on win32/mingw r9440

2012-05-03 Thread MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK)
Can you connect to my server directly? This does not use mooo.com at all, but just my current IP: http://93.201.233.111/jenkins/ Yes - that seems fine. How static is that IP address? Redirecting via some dynamic dns service seems the most flexible option, but the security here seems to be

Re: [fltk.development] fltk3 currently NOT building on win32/mingw r9440

2012-05-03 Thread Matthias Melcher
On 03.05.2012, at 11:35, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: Can you connect to my server directly? This does not use mooo.com at all, but just my current IP: http://93.201.233.111/jenkins/ Yes - that seems fine. How static is that IP address? Redirecting via some dynamic dns

Re: [fltk.development] fltk3 currently NOT building on win32/mingw r9440

2012-05-03 Thread Torsten Giebl
Hello ! FWIW, they don't seem to be blocking dyndns.org domains which is what I usually use, if that's an option? DynDNS is no longer free. I don't mind paying fr a service, but I do mind the hassle of keeping track of these mini payments every month or year. We can try if other DynDNS

Re: [fltk.development] fltk3 currently NOT building on win32/mingw r9440

2012-05-03 Thread Matthias Melcher
On 03.05.2012, at 12:59, Torsten Giebl wrote: Hello ! FWIW, they don't seem to be blocking dyndns.org domains which is what I usually use, if that's an option? DynDNS is no longer free. I don't mind paying fr a service, but I do mind the hassle of keeping track of these mini

Re: [fltk.development] fltk3 currently NOT building on win32/mingw r9440

2012-05-03 Thread MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK)
Yes - that seems fine. How static is that IP address? Redirecting via some dynamic dns service seems the most flexible option, but the security here seems to be blocking anything in the mooo.com space. I have no idea. But there are web sites out there that convert a give host name into

Re: [fltk.development] fltk3 currently NOT building on win32/mingw r9440

2012-05-03 Thread MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK)
This error is fixed in r.9442. Sorry, that was my mistake. That seems good now... Cheers. SELEX Galileo Ltd Registered Office: Sigma House, Christopher Martin Road, Basildon, Essex SS14 3EL A company registered in England Wales. Company no. 02426132

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2834: Make Fl_Help_Viewdraw() andhandle()public

2012-05-03 Thread Bill Spitzak
You described it correctly (except I would pass the rectangle as a reference rather than as 4 numbers), and I think you are right that this would break any existing code that tries to call a base class draw(), as that would call the virtual draw(rect) function. Calling Base::draw() is not