If such changes are being considered, I would MUCH prefer changing to
the limited pseudo-html syntax that is used by Qt and Pango
and possibly
a large number of other pieces of software.
This would let users write foo bboldibold
italic/i/b and so on.
The version I am thinking of
And this patch for an extended xterm like escape sequences can be made
public, I mean can I have it and use it Greg ?
___
fltk-dev mailing list
fltk-dev@easysw.com
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
On 12/10/11 14:41, Ian MacArthur wrote:
On 10 Dec 2011, at 20:44, Domingo Alvarez Duarte wrote:
With this suggestion of VT100 we will have a kind of rich text ! that's
nice !
I'm old enough to have done *quite a lot* of display work using VT100 escape
sequences.
What I'd take away from
On 12/10/11 14:44, Ian MacArthur wrote:
On 10 Dec 2011, at 21:38, Matthias Melcher wrote:
Let's follow Obi Wan Kenobis suggestion and use the source, Luke.
In the code below, you will see that we had an option to enable
and disable the @ prefix all along, using the label type
FL_NORMAL_LABEL
