On 13.03.2012 12:49, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote:
Of course, it looks amazing. Especially for the Control Sequence polygons
in Non-DAW and the Ambisonics panners in Non-Mixer, as they're quite curvy.
It is indeed slightly slower (but I expected that because it's still going
On 13.03.2012 05:04, Evan Laforge wrote:
However, when I dig into the FLTK code to look for a place to install this
permanently, I find a bizarre mess of #if defined(USE_X11) type junk. What
I'd just like to mention I've also been discouraged by the ifdef
thicket in the OS specific files.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Albrecht Schlosser
ajs856s...@go4more.dewrote:
On 13.03.2012 12:49, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote:
Of course, it looks amazing. Especially for the Control Sequence
polygons
in Non-DAW and the Ambisonics panners in Non-Mixer, as they're quite
Sure. Before and after can be found here: http://non.tuxfamily.org/cairo-test
Pretty.
How did you handle text?
Is that still the stock fltk/XFT text interface? I struggled with the Cairo
text interfaces!
The vector knobs and the spatializer widget benefit the most. Ordinary
rectangular FLTK
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:04 AM, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK)
ian.macart...@selexgalileo.com wrote:
Sure. Before and after can be found here:
http://non.tuxfamily.org/cairo-test
Pretty.
How did you handle text?
Is that still the stock fltk/XFT text interface? I struggled with
On 13 Mar 2012, at 17:21, J. Liles wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:04 AM, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK)
ian.macart...@selexgalileo.com wrote:
How did you handle text?
Is that still the stock fltk/XFT text interface? I struggled with the
Cairo text interfaces!
Yeah, I'm still
On 03/12/12 20:30, J. Liles wrote:
However, when I dig into the FLTK code to look for a place to
install this permanently, I find a bizarre mess of #if defined(USE_X11)
type junk. What is the point of having different classes that inherit
from Fl_Graphics_Driver if you're just going to
