> Okay, so if we'd look directly at the label on a higher level draw
> function, then wrapping and symbol expansion would be needed, and
> fl_measure() would be appropriate, but "here" in the given context
> we're probably looking at broken-up strings ready to be rendered,
> and then fl_text_exten
> I believe the same goes for vertical white space as well,
> ie. "\nTesting\n\n\n" and "Testing" would I think return
> the same vertical size.
Yes - that is what I expect/believe it does!
>
> fl_text_extent() does, however, give you the offset from the
> string o
Am On 08.05.2012 14:38, schrieb MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote:
>
>> Question: How "expensive" would measuring the text before doing
>> the real output in X11 be?
>
> I do not know.
> It is likely that the correct answer will be "That depends" I guess.
>
> If the code is running on a loca
On 05/08/12 05:38, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote:
>> Second question: What function should be used: fl_measure() or
>> fl_text_extents()? Would there be a performance difference to be
>> expected, or would it only be the small difference in the exact
>> layout? The latter could IMHO be i
