Le 24/04/2012 02:59, Greg Ercolano a écrit :
A fascinating thread formed today on a large but private CG
mailing list that branched from a discussion on c++11
to STL ABI issues that I found quite interesting, as well
as the problems of exposing STL in a lib's API and
On 24.04.2012, at 02:59, Greg Ercolano wrote:
Very VERY enlightening! I always had a bad feeling about STL in the API, =
but this surpasses my fears. The only usable STL container is =
std::string then, since it does not have a template?=
Most std::string are based on template too like :
A fascinating thread formed today on a large but private CG
mailing list that branched from a discussion on c++11
to STL ABI issues that I found quite interesting, as well
as the problems of exposing STL in a lib's API and why that
should be avoided.
