On 02/21/12 02:01, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote:
>> This is VERY bad because this code is vastly out of date and bloated,
>> and skips processor optimizations that the main ones have in them.
>> Basically on Linux and BSD, these should NEVER be used.
>
> Um, I don't understand. What's out of date? My fltk3 checkout seems to have
> pretty current versions of jpeg (8c) and png(1.5.4) and so on in it.
> Or am I missing the point?
I'd agree with Bill if our libs were out of date,
but I don't think they are.
I know that Mike et al has been keeping the jpg/png libs current,
at least in 1.x.x anyway.
I myself compile statically against FLTK's internal jpg/png libs
to avoid any random aspects of the os's version of these libs.
My goal is to get a consistent version of these libs when I compile
across several platforms, and similarly consistent behavior on the
end user's machines.
_______________________________________________
fltk-dev mailing list
fltk-dev@easysw.com
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
