Re: [fltk.development] [RFC] a new class to supportInternationalization

2013-01-30 Thread MacArthur, Ian (Selex ES, UK)

 True, but not everything can be changed that way, e.g. file chooser,
 fatal errors... 

Ah, right - I thought that was covered too. 
Oh well, I always use the native file chooser these days anyway!

 Also fluid can't be translated and adopted to user
 specific locales.

Yes, fluid is more problematic - though I was more focussed on the end user 
facing aspects of the lib; it does seem to me that the developer facing 
elements, such as fluid, might tolerate a lesser standard of i18n.

Indeed, looking at the recent posts to the lists here, it looks as if *most* of 
the recent posters (apart from me!) are not native English speakers, and most 
are making a better job of it than I am!

Cheers,
-- 
Ian




This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.

___
fltk-dev mailing list
fltk-dev@easysw.com
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev


Re: [fltk.development] [RFC] a new class to supportInternationalization

2013-01-29 Thread Sanel Zukan
Hi Ian,

True, but not everything can be changed that way, e.g. file chooser,
fatal errors... Also fluid can't be translated and adopted to user
specific locales.

Sanel

On 01/29/2013 10:19 PM, Ian MacArthur wrote:
 
 On 29 Jan 2013, at 17:35, Sanel Zukan wrote:
 
 Maybe question is why FLTK does not support (GNU) gettext across whole
 library? This way translation strings could be handled in more standard
 way and you will get for free a bunch of tools or services like Transifex.
 
 Hi Sanel,
 
 I'm not clear what you are proposing here: it doesn't seem to me that there 
 are all that many strings in the library that are exposed in GUI elements, so 
 I'm not sure what we would i18n here... What am I missing?
 
 There are a few places, e.g. in the fl_ask (and related) dialog boxes where 
 strings are coded in, be ISTR that they are all accessible to be changed 
 from user code at runtime?
 
 Other than that...?
 
 

___
fltk-dev mailing list
fltk-dev@easysw.com
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev