Re: [fltk.development] RFC: win32 Fl_Window::icon()vs Fl_Window::xclass()

2013-04-17 Thread MacArthur, Ian (Selex ES, UK)
Just as a side note; I was using the VS7 (ancient) compiler to do the above tests (I still use VS7 for building my commercial apps), but double checked in VS 2010 as well. Both compilers seemed consistent, so if MS did change something, it would've predated

Re: [fltk.development] RFC: win32 Fl_Window::icon() vs Fl_Window::xclass()

2013-04-16 Thread MacArthur, Ian (Selex ES, UK)
I just noticed a few things on win32: [1] If an app sets the window's xclass() *before* it sets the icon(), the icon won't show up in the title bar. Hmm, odd. I did not know that... We have kinda changed the way the xclass is done, more recently than the icon stuff was

Re: [fltk.development] RFC: win32 Fl_Window::icon()vs Fl_Window::xclass()

2013-04-16 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 04/16/13 01:57, MacArthur, Ian (Selex ES, UK) wrote: In fact, I think when the following three calls are being used together, they have to appear in this specific order or they won't work right.. at least on win32 anyway: 1) icon() -- if used with xclass(), this must be first

[fltk.development] RFC: win32 Fl_Window::icon() vs Fl_Window::xclass()

2013-04-15 Thread Greg Ercolano
I just noticed a few things on win32: [1] If an app sets the window's xclass() *before* it sets the icon(), the icon won't show up in the title bar. [2] In the win32 osissues page, under Setting the Icon of a Window there's a NOTE: that reads: