Seconded. This isn't the kind of thing you can really do until we uncouple
the mapping from the hbm.xml.
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 1:58 AM, Paul Batum paul.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Chris,
I am afraid that in its current state, even if the mappings were publicly
accessible, you would struggle
Hi Chad,
any reason for using 2.0 instead of 2.0.1?
Cheers,
Stefan Lieser
--
http://nhplugin.lieser-online.de
Chad Myers schrieb:
FYI, there's a Rake target for switching the binaries. From the trunk/
folder, type rake -T.
These tasks are of particular interest:
rake nhib21
You're missing a call to Configure. Before calling modeloPersistencia.
WriteMappingsTo(@d:\); call
modeloPersistencia.Configure(nhibernateConfig);
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Luis Abreu lab...@gmail.com wrote:
Btw James, one more question:
When using the auto persistence, shouldn't I
Ok, that makes sense.
Thanks,.
---
Luis Abreu
From: fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
[mailto:fluent-nhibern...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of James Gregory
Sent: sexta-feira, 9 de Janeiro de 2009 09:39
To: fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
Subject: [fluent-nhib] Re: question on
It's because with the AutoMapping, no mappings are actually generated until
Configure is called.
As for your other issue, I haven't forgotten about it I'm just not near a
machine I can debug from. Hopefully tonight or sometime over the weekend
I'll get a chance.
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:45 AM,
Hi james
Thanks for looking at this for me. Yeah that makes sense as to why it's
producing no xml. Luis are your problems solved now? Unfortunalty there is
no automatic way to map your version column at this time, you'll have to
take your manual mapping and apply it in the FromDerivedFromClass for
Hi James
Yeah that's correct, I think in theory you could even stick that helper
method in a loop for all classes in namespace or assembly.
Andy
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 12:13 PM, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.comwrote:
Andrew am I correct in thinking this...
There are motions in place for moving away from explicit XML generation in
the mapping, so maybe one day you'll be able to do everything you want to.
However, it isn't our primary concern currently, and as long as there are
major unimplemented NHibernate features, it won't be.
That's not to say I
Basically its a long way away because I am lazy :/
If you want to see one possibility, you could have a look at the pb-rewrite
branch.
As for the visitor case, you should have been able to utilize your own
IMappingVisitor without having to change any fluent nhibernate code. You
make your own
Troy,
I think it's very usefull to combine the automapping with custom
mapping to get the best of both worlds. The approach that I'm testing
out is defining your custom mapping as a specialization of an
automap:
eg.
My entity customer:
public class Customer
{
public Guid Id
That's quite an interesting usage pattern I hadn't thought of Bart. Very
nice.
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:06 PM, bti.timmerm...@gmail.com wrote:
Troy,
I think it's very usefull to combine the automapping with custom
mapping to get the best of both worlds. The approach that I'm testing
out is
I will still look into this behavior, as it is at the very least misleading.
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Luis Abreu lab...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello guys,
Yeah, it looks like now that is the solution for this problem. Using
entityBase results in the creation of mappings for entitybase
Reason? No one has grabbed the 2.0.1 binaries and put them in yet :)
I'll see if I can get this in this weekend if possible, but no guarantees.
-c
From: fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com on behalf of Stefan Lieser
Sent: Fri 1/9/2009 3:35 AM
To:
13 matches
Mail list logo
