gt; ] On Behalf Of James Gregory
>> Sent: 10 March 2009 11:24
>> To: fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: [fluent-nhib] Re: Testing against existing schema
>>
>> There's the PersistenceSpecification which will verify your
>> mappings are persi
anityChecks.aspx
> *
>
>
> *From:* fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com [
> mailto:fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
> ] *On Behalf Of *James Gregory
> *Sent:* 10 March 2009 11:24
> *To:* fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* [fluent-nhib] Re: Testing against existing
> Sent: 10 March 2009 11:24
> To: fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [fluent-nhib] Re: Testing against existing schema
>
> There's the PersistenceSpecification which will verify your mappings
> are persisted correctly. Most of the time we hook it up to a SQLite
2009 11:24
To: fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
Subject: [fluent-nhib] Re: Testing against existing schema
There's the PersistenceSpecification which will verify your mappings are
persisted correctly. Most of the time we hook it up to a SQLite DB, but
there's nothing stopping you fro
There's the PersistenceSpecification which will verify your mappings are
persisted correctly. Most of the time we hook it up to a SQLite DB, but
there's nothing stopping you from using it against another database. Should
work for what you need. Just be warned it doesn't handle complex mappings
very
Not to me sorry, anyone else know anything.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 6:07 PM, brendanjerwin wrote:
>
> I seem to remember reading something a while back about a tool in
> fluent nhibernate (or near it) that would assist in testing that
> mappings do not conflict with an existing schema. Does this r
