Re: FLUXLIST: RE: anti-art, meaning, quote, dolls, erosion-worn rock, etc.

2001-05-29 Thread ann klefstad
Jeez, I hit the send button instead of the paste button. woops. None too soon, say the poor readers. Well, never mind. I was almost done anyway. Thinking about matter, cause I'm just finishing (dammit I hope) a 52 foot long tile relief generated by a process of pressing plant matter into 1in t

Re: FLUXLIST: RE: anti-art, meaning, quote, dolls, erosion-worn rock, etc.

2001-05-29 Thread ann klefstad
Josh Ronsen wrote: > She wrote: “it is a truism that in order to be meaningful it must, by definition, >ultimately be classifiable as "art" by an audience” I kinda think she was being in a hurry and elided a bit, meaning something like "in order to be meaningful [in a reliable or predictable

FLUXLIST: RE: anti-art, meaning, quote, dolls, erosion-worn rock, etc.

2001-05-29 Thread Josh Ronsen
Ann Klefstad steps up to the mic and says: >You know, the writer you quote wasn't saying that art is the only thing that has >meaning; she was essentially saying that the meaning of art-intended gestures is >inflected by their relationship to the art-meaning realm. My question was worde