ok folks,
nice to have the 1:hot:min going again, but let me add some corrective
remarks to the self-organizing process that we're in: Cecil is absolutely right
saying that the original idea is not modifying or deleting or filtering or
reorganizing, but adding something to the mix. (although I
Listed to the interesting 1 minute. Now, correct me if I am wrong, but I
don't hear the previous two works in there anywhere. I understood that
I did still hear them. With some modifications.
each were supposed to add to the original but not subtract anything or
extend beyond the one minute
On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, zap strassburger wrote:
Dear future-generations of 1:hot:min!
Do anything you want, but keep the work of your predecessors alive.
All this does is eliminate my contribution and the initial "seed;" I think
that either Heiko needs to remix, or the first two stages are to be
Oh well, maybe that's the solution: we can just keep (re)cycling the same
material with additional inputs: the list of participants should recycle
as well: (?) /:b
On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, Heiko Recktenwald wrote:
Listed to the interesting 1 minute. Now, correct me if I am wrong, but I
don't
hello my contributions to the big toppics are as follows
gendre
rece
food
language
supermarkets
bacteria
mars
hope they are of some use to you
take care phill xx
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail
All this does is eliminate my contribution and the initial "seed;" I think
that either Heiko needs to remix, or the first two stages are to be
readmitted at the end of the cycle.
I think nobody at this experiment can expect his own contribution to be
like it once was.
But experiences like
OK, I think I see your tact Heiko and will reintroduce the earlier
versions now that it comes to me. But personally I believe all material
that comes to each person from previous contributors should be kept
intact and identifiable. I want to hear everything from everyone in as
original a form as
OK sol,
Over to you. You can pick up hot minute #4. I put some notes about what
I did in the history file.
Cecil
versions now that it comes to me. But personally I believe all material
that comes to each person from previous contributors should be kept
intact and identifiable. I want to hear everything from everyone in as
Ah, this was a misunderstanding. What means "intact and identifiable" ?
Zaps
Owen
This is really well done. As a person who has a fetish about cast-off
objects I found it very refreshing. Thanks.
RA
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Owen Smith)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 4/7/01 5:17:35 PM
Subject: FLUXLIST: new project/site
For those of you who might
I am going to dig up and divide my irises. If I dig them up now will they
have flowers this year?
hi brad,
according to my garden book the time to divide iris is autumn when the plants
are dormant. my chionodoxa sardensis and the scilla siberica are blooming,
their beautiful gentian-blue flowers are quite special in the snow. how big is
your garden?
do you still have all those little boxes
12 matches
Mail list logo
