[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, I read this but I have to say that most of it seems to miss the
point
of Fluxus (or at least as I understand it) that works are to be simple
yet
thought provoking.
Interestingly enough this was one of the major complaints about the
paper when it was first given
I've been reading a print-out an article I found on the 'net by Kathy O'Dell
entitled "Fluxus Feminus" circa 1997, which is interesting reading and
relates to Reed's posting on the women of fluxus/fluxus attitudes towards
women, and the other postings on marriage performance.
2 matches
Mail list logo
