Re: [fonc] st71-one-pager (was: Barbarians at the gate!)

2012-03-27 Thread shaun gilchrist
Jecel, Thank you for the clarification - I must have parsed the reference to appendix III incorrectly. So it is safe to assume that nothing exists, other than the notion and intent, of smalltalk 71? On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Jecel Assumpcao Jr. wrote: > Shaun, > > > Here is my current att

Re: [fonc] Everything You Know (about Parallel Programming) Is Wrong!: A Wild Screed about the Future

2012-03-27 Thread BGB
On 3/27/2012 6:16 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote: BGB wrote: granted, language-design may still need some work to find an ideal programming model for working with concurrent systems, but I still more suspect it will probably end up looking more like "existing language with better concurrency featu

Re: [fonc] Everything You Know (about Parallel Programming) Is Wrong!: A Wild Screed about the Future

2012-03-27 Thread Miles Fidelman
BGB wrote: granted, language-design may still need some work to find an ideal programming model for working with concurrent systems, but I still more suspect it will probably end up looking more like "existing language with better concurrency features bolted on" than "some fundamentally new

Re: [fonc] Everything You Know (about Parallel Programming) Is Wrong!: A Wild Screed about the Future

2012-03-27 Thread BGB
On 3/27/2012 12:23 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote: karl ramberg wrote: Slides/pdf: http://www.dynamic-languages-symposium.org/dls-11/program/media/Ungar_2011_EverythingYouKnowAboutParallelProgrammingIsWrongAWildScreedAboutTheFuture_Dls.pdf Granted that their approach to an OLAP cube is new, but

Re: [fonc] Everything You Know (about Parallel Programming) Is Wrong!: A Wild Screed about the Future

2012-03-27 Thread Miles Fidelman
karl ramberg wrote: Slides/pdf: http://www.dynamic-languages-symposium.org/dls-11/program/media/Ungar_2011_EverythingYouKnowAboutParallelProgrammingIsWrongAWildScreedAboutTheFuture_Dls.pdf Granted that their approach to an OLAP cube is new, but the folks behind Erlang, and Carl Hewitt hav

Re: [fonc] Everything You Know (about Parallel Programming) Is Wrong!: A Wild Screed about the Future

2012-03-27 Thread karl ramberg
Slides/pdf: http://www.dynamic-languages-symposium.org/dls-11/program/media/Ungar_2011_EverythingYouKnowAboutParallelProgrammingIsWrongAWildScreedAboutTheFuture_Dls.pdf Karl On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Craig Latta wrote: > > Hi-- > > Was the talk recorded? > > > thanks, > > -C > >

Re: [fonc] Everything You Know (about Parallel Programming) Is Wrong!: A Wild Screed about the Future

2012-03-27 Thread Bob Arning
there is a pdf from Nov 2011: http://www.dynamic-languages-symposium.org/dls-11/program/media/Ungar_2011_EverythingYouKnowAboutParallelProgrammingIsWrongAWildScreedAboutTheFuture_Dls.pdf On 3/27/12 1:03 PM, Craig Latta wrote: Hi-- Was the talk recorded? thanks, -C -- Craig Latt

Re: [fonc] Everything You Know (about Parallel Programming) Is Wrong!: A Wild Screed about the Future

2012-03-27 Thread Martin McClure
On 03/27/2012 10:03 AM, Craig Latta wrote: > > Hi-- > > Was the talk recorded? Hi Craig, As far as I know, the talk itself was not recorded. 'Twas a good talk, though. Among other things, Dave brilliantly and entertainingly illustrated race conditions using the plot of "Romeo and Juliet".

Re: [fonc] Everything You Know (about Parallel Programming) Is Wrong!: A Wild Screed about the Future

2012-03-27 Thread Craig Latta
Hi-- Was the talk recorded? thanks, -C -- Craig Latta www.netjam.org/resume +31 6 2757 7177 + 1 415 287 3547 + 1 510 282 7468 ___ fonc mailing list fonc@vpri.org http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc

[fonc] Everything You Know (about Parallel Programming) Is Wrong!: A Wild Screed about the Future

2012-03-27 Thread Eugen Leitl
http://splashcon.org/2011/program/dls/245-invited-talk-2 Mon 2:00-3:00 pm - Pavilion East Everything You Know (about Parallel Programming) Is Wrong!: A Wild Screed about the Future invited speakerDavid Ungar, IBM Research, USA In the 1970’s, researchers at Xerox PARC gave themselves a glimpse