On 11/6/2013 3:55 AM, Chris Warburton wrote:
BGB cr88...@gmail.com writes:
it is sad, in premise, that hard-coded Visual Studio projects, and raw
Makefiles, are often easier to get to work when things don't go just
right. well, that and one time recently managing to apparently get on
the bad
BGB cr88...@gmail.com writes:
it is sad, in premise, that hard-coded Visual Studio projects, and raw
Makefiles, are often easier to get to work when things don't go just
right. well, that and one time recently managing to apparently get on
the bad side of some developers for a FOSS GPL
On 11/5/2013 7:15 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Casey Ransberger casey.obrien.r at gmail.comwrites
mailto:fonc%40vpri.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5Bfonc%5D%20Task%20management%20in%20a%20world%20without%20apps.In-Reply-To=%3CDD90A941-C94A-4F01-A013-6D838B0B2524%40gmail.com%3E
A fun, but maybe idealistic
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 04:11:15AM -0800, Alan Kay wrote:
if we were to attempt an ultra high level general purpose language
today, we wouldn't use Squeak or any other Smalltalk as a model or a
starting place.
May I ask what would be an acceptable starting point? Maru, maybe?
Loup.
