[fonc] [SUGGESTION] Simplify fonc link in wiki

2010-05-07 Thread DeNigris Sean
Suggestion: For the Idst/COLA links on http://www.vpri.org/vp_wiki/index.php/Main_Page: * remove the http://piumarta.com/software/cola/ link, which provides instructions for the trunk. * use the http://vpri.org/fonc_wiki/index.php/Installation_Guide which mentions the stable version first, and al

Re: [fonc] Any newer FoNC distribution ?

2010-05-07 Thread Alan Kay
As the president of RAND said to the Air Force general "Research is like roulette, nothing counts until the ball drops!" From: Kevin DeGraaf To: Fundamentals of New Computing Sent: Fri, May 7, 2010 10:26:42 AM Subject: Re: [fonc] Any newer FoNC distribution

Re: [fonc] Any newer FoNC distribution ?

2010-05-07 Thread David Girle
Thanks, will try. TCP & Time support are what I am looking for at present, will try earlier versions if necessary. David On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Kevin Kelley wrote: > The Boehm collector's got all kinds of tweaks and notes about different > build > configs; it more than likely can be ma

Re: [fonc] Any newer FoNC distribution ?

2010-05-07 Thread Kevin DeGraaf
Yes, I have looked through that. I am referring specifically to the DBJr project, and related code or projects (LBox, Lesserphic2, your Text Field rules system, etc.). I see Nile/Gezira out there, but nothing specific to DBJr, although maybe I am just not looking in the right place. Thanks, Kev

Re: [fonc] Any newer FoNC distribution ?

2010-05-07 Thread Kevin Kelley
The Boehm collector's got all kinds of tweaks and notes about different build configs; it more than likely can be made to build on your system. I'm guessing you just need to spend some quality time figuring out which buttons to push. If the "configure" steps didn't work for you, try the "d

Re: [fonc] Any newer FoNC distribution ?

2010-05-07 Thread Dan Amelang
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Kevin DeGraaf wrote: > Also, any chance the source code for any of the current projects > mentioned in the report might become publicly available to look at? > If they are out there, they are well hidden.  Thanks, Hello Kevin, On the vpri.org homepage, there is a

Re: [fonc] Any newer FoNC distribution ?

2010-05-07 Thread Kevin DeGraaf
Also, any chance the source code for any of the current projects mentioned in the report might become publicly available to look at? If they are out there, they are well hidden. Thanks, Kevin. On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Kim Rose wrote: > Sure. > Kim > > > Viewpoints Research is a 501(c)(3

Re: [fonc] 2009 NSF report

2010-05-07 Thread Alejandro Garcia
Thank you! We have been waiting for this. And really appreciate you sharing your work with us. On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Alan Kay wrote: > Hi Kim, > > A real flaw here is that our carefully made "first page" is not rendered > well in the pdf version. We need some "special handling" here

Re: [fonc] 2009 NSF report

2010-05-07 Thread Alan Kay
Hi Kim, A real flaw here is that our carefully made "first page" is not rendered well in the pdf version. We need some "special handling" here to get it to look as good as it did in MS Word. Even though it's a pain, I would suggest just saying that this picture did not transmogrify well into p

[fonc] 2009 NSF report

2010-05-07 Thread Kim Rose
The 2009 progress report is now online - http://www.vpri.org/html/writings.php -- Kim ___ fonc mailing list fonc@vpri.org http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc

Re: [fonc] Any newer FoNC distribution ?

2010-05-07 Thread David Girle
Thanks, the script did generate the necessary directory, etc. However the make failed with: gcc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"gc\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"gc\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"7.0\" "-DPACKAGE_STRING=\"gc 7.0\"" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"hans.bo...@hp.com\" -DGC_VERSION_MAJOR=7 -DGC_VERSION_MINOR=0 -DPACKAGE=\"g