On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Max Orhai wrote:
> Probability is highly applicable to (bounded) nondeterminism, but I get
> the impression that most CS theorists don't tend to learn much about it,
> and I know for sure that it gets extremely short shrift in the applied CS
> curriculum at my sc
Sorry about the last post. It was a mistake.
From: fonc-boun...@vpri.org [mailto:fonc-boun...@vpri.org] On Behalf Of Max
Orhai
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 2:30 PM
To: Fundamentals of New Computing
Subject: Re: [fonc] Everything You Know (about Parallel Programming) Is
Wrong!: A Wild Screed
Any last submissions?
The reviewers are the core contributors from last year.
From: fonc-boun...@vpri.org [mailto:fonc-boun...@vpri.org] On Behalf Of Max
Orhai
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 2:30 PM
To: Fundamentals of New Computing
Subject: Re: [fonc] Everything You Know (about Parallel Pr
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 5:46 PM, David Barbour wrote:
Where we do give up determinism, it should be explicit and carefully
> considered, and we should have a lot of control over exactly where it leaks
> into our programs.
>
Hear, hear! And another thing: the mathematics of probability is pretty