Re: [fonc] I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn

2014-09-25 Thread Peter Franta
No worries On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:28 PM, John Carlson wrote: > Oops. Too many check boxes to uncheck. Sorry. > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 7:15 AM, John Carlson wrote: > >> >> >>[image: LinkedIn] >>

Re: [fonc] Stephen Wolfram on the Wolfram Language

2014-09-25 Thread Chris Warburton
One issue which will be interesting for the Wolfram language is whether it evolves or stagnates across the years and decades. Would language features be allowed, if they disrupt some of the vast library? For example, Java can still be regarded as two languages: one that's thread-safe and one that'

Re: [fonc] Stephen Wolfram on the Wolfram Language

2014-09-25 Thread BGB
On 9/24/2014 6:39 PM, David Leibs wrote: I think Stephen is misrepresenting the Wolfram Language when he says it is a big language. He is really talking about the built in library which is indeed huge. The language proper is actually simple, powerful, and lispy. -David I think it is partly

Re: [fonc] I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn

2014-09-25 Thread John Carlson
Oops. Too many check boxes to uncheck. Sorry. On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 7:15 AM, John Carlson wrote: > > >[image: LinkedIn] >

[fonc] I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn

2014-09-25 Thread John Carlson
Hi Fundamentals, I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. - John Accept: http://www.linkedin.com/blink?simpleRedirect=3wQdzkVcj4VdjkSejsTe30OejkZh4BKrSBQonhFtCVF9AwTcjBEqnh9fnBBiShBsC5EsOpQsSlRpRZBt6BSrCAZqSkConhzbmlQqnpKqiRQsSlRpORIrmkZpSVFqSdxsDgCpnhFtCV9pSlipn9Mfm4Cqj8Ju3c