Re: [fonc]( picoVerse-:( picoLARC AssemblerLisp test cases so far ) )

2008-11-09 Thread John Leuner
On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 15:29 -0800, Kjell Godo wrote: If you know how to make these tools work off the top of your head could you help me a little? I don't know anything about executable file formats. I conjecture that flat file is what I want. Since Udo tells CodeX to generate flat file in

[fonc]( picoVerse-:( picoLARC AssemblerLisp test cases so far ) )

2008-11-07 Thread Kjell Godo
Below is the sequence of 9 tests of the picoLARC AssemblerLisp's ability to generate machine code. My hat is off to the person who suggested using ollydbg to generate the codes that can then be tested against. That really made things a lot easier. I seem to be able to understand machine code a

Re: [fonc]( picoVerse-:( picoLARC AssemblerLisp test cases so far ) )

2008-11-07 Thread John Leuner
I think you could simplify your testing by writing the output from a sequence of tests to a binary file. Then use a command line assembler (like nasm) to assemble source code with the same desired output. Then simply compare the binary files, if they differ, try to find where they differ (with