Top-post: thanks for your reply. I'll check this stuff out. Somehow I missed
this when you sent it.
Casey
On Sep 7, 2011, at 1:50 PM, David Barbour wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Casey Ransberger
> wrote:
> It seems to me that there is tension here, forces pulling in orthogonal
On 9/7/11 3:50 PM, David Barbour wrote:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Casey Ransberger
mailto:casey.obrie...@gmail.com>> wrote:
It seems to me that there is tension here, forces pulling in
orthogonal directions. In systems which include a MOP, it seems as
though encapsulation is s
Yep.
Cheers,
Alan
>
>From: David Barbour
>To: Fundamentals of New Computing
>Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2011 1:50 PM
>Subject: Re: [fonc] Tension between meta-object protocol and encapsulation
>
>
>On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Casey Ransberger
wrote:
> It seems to me that there is tension here, forces pulling in orthogonal
> directions. In systems which include a MOP, it seems as though encapsulation
> is sort of hosed at will. Certainly I'm not arguing against the MOP, it's
> one of the
eers,
Alan
>
>From: Casey Ransberger
>To: Fundamentals of New Computing
>Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2011 12:48 PM
>Subject: [fonc] Tension between meta-object protocol and encapsulation
>
>
>This has been bugging me for awhile. This
This has been bugging me for awhile. This seems like the best forum to ask
about it.
"With great power comes great responsibility." This quotation is hard to pin
down. There are several versions of it to be found. This particular phrasing
of the statement probably belongs to Stan Lee, but I think
