Re: [fonc] Why Mind Uploading could be horrible

2013-04-23 Thread Loup Vaillant-David
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 04:01:20PM +0200, Eugen Leitl wrote: On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 02:05:07PM -0500, Tristan Slominski wrote: That alone seems to me to dismiss the concern that mind uploading would not be possible (despite that I think it's a wrong and a horrible idea personally :D)

Re: [fonc] Why Mind Uploading could be horrible

2013-04-23 Thread Tristan Slominski
With great trepidation, I will try to keep this to computing :D It may revolve around the meaning of uploading, but my problem with the uploading approach, is that it makes a copy. Whether a copy is the same as the real thing I feel is beyond the scope of a computing discussion in this particular

Re: [fonc] Why Mind Uploading could be horrible

2013-04-23 Thread John Nilsson
It's not so much if a copy is the same as the real thing, but rather how do you define the difference between an all-at-once copy with a simultaneous destruction of the original and a piece by piece replacement of the parts? It seems to me they only differ by the size of the part replaced. BR John

Re: [fonc] Why Mind Uploading could be horrible

2013-04-23 Thread Tristan Slominski
It seems to me they only differ by the size of the part replaced. I agree. And that seems to be a subject of future research as well, the whole engineering to get stuff within tolerance side of things. :D What I find interesting is if, instead of replacing a part, we want to add parts. Extra