On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Julian Leviston wrote:
> I guess my question is... what's stopping an alternative, replacement,
backwardly-compatible protocol from taking over where http and https
leave off?
HTTP and HTTPS are not very good protocols if your goals relate to
low-latency, secur
On 26 July 2011 02:40, Julian Leviston wrote:
>
> On 26/07/2011, at 1:43 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>
>> (quotes are broken)
>>
>> On 25 July 2011 16:26, Julian Leviston wrote:
>>>
>>> On 26/07/2011, at 12:03 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>>>
>>> In contrast, as you mentioned, TCP/IP protocol which is b
On 26/07/2011, at 1:43 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
> (quotes are broken)
>
> On 25 July 2011 16:26, Julian Leviston wrote:
>>
>> On 26/07/2011, at 12:03 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>>
>> In contrast, as you mentioned, TCP/IP protocol which is backbone of
>> today's internet having much better desig
