Re: [fonc] extensible parser

2008-04-12 Thread Nathan Cain
Hello, It is excellent to finally see the ometa work and the 'sodas' work coming together. I think that the two together are an unstoppable force of nature, in some ways. I notice that there is an arm backend for jolt2. I work in embedded systems, and would love to be able to

Re: [fonc] static compilation [was: port of jolt-burg]

2008-04-25 Thread Nathan Cain
Hi Michael, I was hoping to toy with this some, and start in on adapting an arm backend... unfortunately, the patch does not want to apply, as it seems to expect a different jolt2/boot.k then what is in svn r407. Perhaps I need another of your patches as well, beyond just jolt2-fixes? Could

Re: [fonc] 64-bit? was: fonc on ubuntu.

2008-06-06 Thread Nathan Cain
I was only ever able to build on x86_64 using -m32 everywhere On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Michael FIG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Colm Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: getting the exact same message compiling using ubuntu as listed on the wiki for fedora 8. Do you mean the

Re: [fonc] FPGA targets?

2009-03-03 Thread Nathan Cain
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Luke Breuer labre...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Nathan Cain n...@inverse-engineering.com wrote: I am wondering what work is being done/planned for targeting FPGA platforms. My interests overlap with this field, and I would like

Re: [fonc] Re: [Ometa] FPGA targets?

2009-03-03 Thread Nathan Cain
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Jecel Assumpcao Jr je...@merlintec.comwrote: The key thing is to have some model of parallelism which is used by the source code. If you try to extract automatically parallelism from normal application code you will just make things needlessly complicated for