David,
Thanks for the link. Indeed, now I see how to run eval with .l example
files. There are also .k files, which I don't know how they differ from
those, except that .k files are called with ./eval filename.k while
.l files are called with ./eval repl.l filename.l where filename is
the name
On 27 February 2012 14:01, Martin Baldan martino...@gmail.com wrote:
I still don't know how to go from here to a Frank-like GUI. I'm reading
other replies which seem to point that way. All tips are welcome ;)
And indeed, maybe any discoveries could be written up at one of the Wikis:
Hi Julian
I should probably comment on this, since it seems that the STEPS reports
haven't made it clear enough.
STEPS is a science experiment not an engineering project.
It is not at all about making and distributing an operating system etc., but
about trying to investigate the tradeoffs
Just to zero in on one idea here
Anyway I digress... have you had a look at this file?:
http://piumarta.com/software/maru/maru-2.1/test-pepsi.l
Just read the whole thing - I found it fairly interesting :) He's build
pepsi on maru there... that's pretty fascinating, right? Built a micro
Alan ---
I appreciate both you explanation and what you are doing. Of course
jealousy comes into it, because you guys appear to be having a lot of fun
mixed in with your hard work, and I would love to part of that. I know
where I would be breaking down the doors if I was starting a masters or
Hi Alan,
On 27 February 2012 11:32, Alan Kay alan.n...@yahoo.com wrote:
[...] a better constraint system. [...] This has led us to start putting
constraint engines into STEPS, thinking about how to automatically organize
various solvers, what kinds of POLs would be nice to make constraint
On 2/27/2012 10:30 AM, Steve Wart wrote:
Just to zero in on one idea here
Anyway I digress... have you had a look at this file?:
http://piumarta.com/software/maru/maru-2.1/test-pepsi.l
Just read the whole thing - I found it fairly interesting :) He's
build pepsi on maru
Hi Tony
Yes, I've seen it. As Gerry says, it is an extension of Guy Steele's thesis.
When I read this, I wished for a more interesting, comprehensive and
wider-ranging and -scaling example to help think with.
One reason to put up with some of the problems of defining things using
I am interested in the embedded uses of Maru, so I cannot comment on
how to get from here to a Frank-like GUI. I have no idea how many
others on this list are interested in the Internet of Things (IoT),
but I expect parts of Frank will be useful in that space. Maybe 5kLOC
will bring up a
On 2/27/2012 10:31 AM, David Harris wrote:
Alan ---
I appreciate both you explanation and what you are doing. Of course
jealousy comes into it, because you guys appear to be having a lot of
fun mixed in with your hard work, and I would love to part of that. I
know where I would be breaking
On 2/27/2012 1:27 PM, David Girle wrote:
I am interested in the embedded uses of Maru, so I cannot comment on
how to get from here to a Frank-like GUI. I have no idea how many
others on this list are interested in the Internet of Things (IoT),
but I expect parts of Frank will be useful in that
Hi Tony
I like what the BOOM/BLOOM people are doing quite a bit. Their version of
Datalog + Time is definitely in accord with lots of our prejudices ...
Cheers,
Alan
From: Tony Garnock-Jones tonygarnockjo...@gmail.com
To: Alan Kay alan.n...@yahoo.com
Cc:
Structural optimisation is not compression. Lurk more.
Julian
On 28/02/2012, at 3:38 PM, BGB wrote:
granted, I remain a little skeptical.
I think there is a bit of a difference though between, say, a log table, and
a typical piece of software.
a log table is, essentially, almost pure
On 2/27/2012 10:08 PM, Julian Leviston wrote:
Structural optimisation is not compression. Lurk more.
probably will drop this, as arguing about all this is likely pointless
and counter-productive.
but, is there any particular reason for why similar rules and
restrictions wouldn't apply?
14 matches
Mail list logo
