You're assuming that QA is a good way to discuss a topic in depth.
Personally, I don't. (IMHO) Stack exchange is great for technical
support, and quick research into questions - not so great for discussing
topics in depth.
For the avowed purpose of influenc(ing) and foster(ing) interest, in
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net
wrote:
You're assuming that QA is a good way to discuss a topic in depth.
I believe you're misreading Julian. AFAICT, he's said nothing about the
utility of the discussions on each site.
QA can be good for depth - see
For anybody interested in this sort of site: I while ago I found myself
asking for something more frequently updated and less-demanding of a math
degree than LtU, but without all the silicon valley VC navelgazing of
HN. A friend pointed me to https://lobste.rs/ which so far seems to have a
nice
