On Tuesday 20 August 2002 9:57 pm, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
| OT I'm pretty sure Microsoft ships a number of .ttf files with only
| OT bitmaps and no outlines with Windows...
|
| Interesting. Which ones?
GulimChe.ttf (Korean lang.font) has enermous amount of bitmaps, I think, for
all point
On Tuesday 20 August 2002 1:21 am, Pablo Saratxaga wrote:
| Kaixo!
|
| On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 07:35:33PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
| I'm currently exploring the possibility of moving XFree86 from the PCF
| format to the sfnt format for bitmap fonts. I've encountered a number
|
|
Kaixo!
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 05:44:13PM +0400, Vadim Plessky wrote:
| You should also decide on an extenson name other than .ttf, to avoid
| that those bitmap only ttf files get confused wwith real scalable
| fonts by people out there, otherwise there would be a lot of bad
|
Pablo Saratxaga [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kaixo!
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 05:44:13PM +0400, Vadim Plessky wrote:
| You should also decide on an extenson name other than .ttf, to avoid
| that those bitmap only ttf files get confused wwith real scalable
| fonts by people out there,
PS what will happen if one of such programs tries to use a bitmap
PS only font for displaying at a size for xhich there are no bitmaps
PS embedded ?
It will get sixty-odd thousand blank glyphs.
Juliusz
___
Fonts
OT I'm pretty sure Microsoft ships a number of .ttf files with only
OT bitmaps and no outlines with Windows...
Interesting. Which ones?
Juliusz
___
Fonts mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Thanks a lot for the previous fix, I'll try it out tonight.
I'm currently exploring the possibility of moving XFree86 from the PCF
format to the sfnt format for bitmap fonts. I've encountered a number
of minor bugs in FreeType 2.1.2 that prevent me from using such
bitmap-only sfnts.
1.
