https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820166
Bug 1820166 depends on bug 1938205, which changed state.
Bug 1938205 Summary: google-droid-sans-fonts has higher priority than
google-noto-sans-fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938205
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820166
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820166
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #20 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820166
--- Comment #19 from Peng Wu ---
Hi Andre, I think the pango-view tool doesn't support the font fallback list.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820166
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820166
--- Comment #18 from a3emdot ---
Created attachment 1850357
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1850357=edit
archive of pango-view output
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820166
a3emdot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andre.ma...@gmx.de
--- Comment #17 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820166
vtq changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vtq-gn...@outlook.com
--- Comment #16 from vtq
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820166
--- Comment #15 from Jens Petersen ---
I agree it makes sense to lower google-droid-fonts priority, since it is not a
default user font, but installed by default due to gs.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820166
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|32 |34
Severity|low
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820166
Akira TAGOH changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1938205
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820166
Akira TAGOH changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Droid has higher priority |Droid sans overrides my
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820166
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|p...@redhat.com |ta...@redhat.com
--- Comment #13
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820166
--- Comment #12 from Akira TAGOH ---
(In reply to Akira TAGOH from comment #11)
> As I said in the previous comment, this is irrelevant to users
> configuration. this issue can be reproduced without custom configuration
> once you install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820166
--- Comment #11 from Akira TAGOH ---
Sorry for late response, I missed the notification mail from bugzilla.
(In reply to Nicolas Mailhot from comment #10)
> > So I'm wondering why you did push your packages only even though you know
> > you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820166
--- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot ---
> So I'm wondering why you did push your packages only even though you know you
> break it.
First, this change did not break any Fedora package or config. It broke one
*user* configuration.
And
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820166
--- Comment #9 from Akira TAGOH ---
(In reply to Nicolas Mailhot from comment #7)
> (In reply to Akira TAGOH from comment #6)
>
> > Let's say more specific thing then. as this report complains about CJK,
> > Google Noto CJK fonts isn't even
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820166
--- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot ---
Also the “let’s kludge things for « special family » so fontconfig can avoid
looking at the general problem” is exactly what we’ve been doing for Droid for
more than a decade now.
So, complaining about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820166
--- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot ---
(In reply to Akira TAGOH from comment #6)
> Let's say more specific thing then. as this report complains about CJK,
> Google Noto CJK fonts isn't even inherited from Google Droid Japanese nor
> Google
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820166
--- Comment #6 from Akira TAGOH ---
(In reply to Nicolas Mailhot from comment #5)
> It’s not "looking only at the latin glyphs". Noto and Droid are both wide
> coverage font families, and Noto started by inheriting all the coverage
> already
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820166
--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot ---
(In reply to Akira TAGOH from comment #4)
> > Why? Noto is effectively Droid v2. It is the same design, produced by the
> > same people, for the same use cases. There are some metric differences, but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820166
--- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH ---
> Why? Noto is effectively Droid v2. It is the same design, produced by the
> same people, for the same use cases. There are some metric differences, but
> mostly, it is an evolution of the same family.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820166
Nicolas Mailhot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot@l |
|aposte.net)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820166
Akira TAGOH changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot@l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820166
Nicolas Mailhot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mfab...@redhat.com,
24 matches
Mail list logo
