[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

2022-02-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-4d96088a85 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

2022-02-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

2022-02-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-76ec126c4f has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

2022-02-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #22 from

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

2022-02-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #20 from

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

2022-02-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #20 from

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

2022-02-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 --- Comment #19 from Igor Raits --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/uniol-fonts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

2022-02-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

2022-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 --- Comment #18 from Parag AN(पराग) --- Sure I will guide you. Let's finish all your 4 package reviews and then I will sponsor you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

2022-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 --- Comment #17 from Dr Anirban Mitra --- Thanks for review approval. Please help with the next steps in getting sponsor to get necessary credentials -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

2022-02-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

2022-02-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 --- Comment #15 from Dr Anirban Mitra --- SPEC: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mitradranirban/uniol-fonts/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/03330673-uniol-fonts/uniol-fonts.spec SRPM:

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

2022-02-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 --- Comment #14 from Parag AN(पराग) --- You got wrong syntax for disttag. Please check again comment#1 in this bug. You need to use Release: 5%{?dist} -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

2022-02-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 --- Comment #13 from Dr Anirban Mitra --- Made changes as suggested SPEC: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mitradranirban/uniol-fonts/fedora-35-x86_64/03330516-uniol-fonts/uniol-fonts.spec SRPM:

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

2022-02-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 --- Comment #12 from Parag AN(पराग) --- 1) You don't need below lines BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem These packages does not exists now in Fedora and replaced by fonts-rpm-macros package. 2) You

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

2022-02-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 --- Comment #11 from Dr Anirban Mitra --- https://dSPEC: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mitradranirban/uniol-fonts/fedora-35-x86_64/03330411-uniol-fonts/uniol-fonts.spec SRPM:

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

2022-02-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 --- Comment #10 from Dr Anirban Mitra --- SPEC: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mitradranirban/uniol-fonts/fedora-35-x86_64/03330411-uniol-fonts/uniol-fonts.spec SRPM:

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

2022-02-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 --- Comment #9 from Parag AN(पराग) --- 1) You need to use either one as suggested in packaging guidelines. Either commit or tag. If you want to use commit, then gittag line becomes optional. 2) If we use the commit approach then let's

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

2022-02-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 --- Comment #8 from Dr Anirban Mitra --- Corrected SPEC as suggested https://github.com/mitradranirban/uniol-fonts/raw/main/SPECS/uniol-fonts.spec Also added generate.pe and fontconfig to upstream source and bumped its version and tag to

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

2022-02-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(पराग) --- 1) You have not retagged from 1 to 1.0.0 yet. 2) I think your tarball does not include 66-0-uniol-fonts.conf and generate.pe file but you are trying to use it. See this is the reason I am telling first

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

2022-02-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(पराग) --- Please correct the tag. You tagged version as "1" which should be "1.0.0". Once this is fixed, we can check later how to write SPEC using forge macros. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

2022-02-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 --- Comment #4 from Dr Anirban Mitra --- Sorry for the typo, Upstream font project is https://github.com/mitradranirban/font-uniol and release tag is 1 I created a SPEC

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

2022-02-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) --- Currently I am unable to open https://mitradranirban/font-uniol Once I see its contents I can provide similar suggestions as I did in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048456#c18 -- You are

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

2022-02-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 --- Comment #2 from Dr Anirban Mitra --- Local building with %dist leads to formation of uniol-fonts-1.0.0-2.fc34.src.rpm as I am running fedora 34 presently; Do I have to do koji build with mock for rawhide ? with the spec showing Source0:

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

2022-02-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) --- 1) disttag is not present. You need to write Release: 1 as Release: 1%{?dist} Read https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/DistTag/ 2) The Source0 line is not the way

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

2022-02-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

2022-02-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 Dr Anirban Mitra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproj