https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080
--- Comment #19 from Akira TAGOH ---
Yes, this assumes that default-fonts metapackages from langpacks provides
expected default fonts.
If fontquery reports some difference between local and container image, that
would means some font packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080
--- Comment #18 from Adam Williamson ---
OK. How does this tool work, exactly? It seems to be comparing the local system
against a container image, right? How is the container image generated? How do
we make sure that *it* is correct? I'm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080
Akira TAGOH changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(ta...@redhat.com) |
--- Comment #17 from Akira TAGOH ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080
Adam Williamson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(ta...@redhat.com)
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080
Akira TAGOH changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080
--- Comment #13 from Akira TAGOH ---
Sorry for taking a long time on it. I have updated
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_i18n_default_fonts too.
Particularly speaking of this case, paktype-naskh-basic-fonts (and
kacst-book-fonts in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080
--- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen ---
Also for QA release testing it might be enough to focus mainly on Sans results
across all languages for now?
This could then be extended to Serif once that hopefully stabilizes
(for a lot of scripts Mono
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080
--- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen ---
See for example current
https://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/fonts/status/38-diff-comps-vs-langpacks.html
So the results vary depending whether the related langpacks are installed or
not.
We have some major
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080
Adam Williamson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|36 |rawhide
--- Comment #10 from Adam
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080
--- Comment #9 from Ben Cotton ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 36 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 36 on
2023-05-16.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080
--- Comment #8 from Akira TAGOH ---
Well, the table was generated with all the langpacks installed. if the result
of the test case is different, it would means there are some font packages
which affects default fonts for other languages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080
--- Comment #7 from Lukas Ruzicka ---
The Server DVD is used to start the Anaconda in which I choose to install
Fedora Workstation, after the installation the system is rebooted and the test
is performed.
The test run is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080
Akira TAGOH changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(ta...@redhat.com) |
--- Comment #6 from Akira TAGOH ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080
Lukas Ruzicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(ta...@redhat.com)
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080
Akira TAGOH changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(ta...@redhat.com) |
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080
--- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH ---
I have updated the test case. please check again.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080
Lukas Ruzicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080
Red Hat One Jira (issues.redhat.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||Red Hat Issue
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080
--- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH ---
Apparently that testcase is outdated. the latest one would be
https://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/fonts/status/36.html though, it isn't reflected
packages from langpacks. I'm updating the list for other purpose.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080
Adam Williamson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||openqa
--- Comment #1 from Adam
20 matches
Mail list logo
