[Bug 595677] Dependency issue with upgrade in 37 - 38

2010-05-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595677 --- Comment #9 from Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com 2010-05-27 02:37:07 EDT ---

[Bug 595677] Dependency issue with upgrade in 37 - 38

2010-05-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595677 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 595677] Dependency issue with upgrade in 37 - 38

2010-05-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595677 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-27 03:27:02 EDT ---

[Bug 595677] Dependency issue with upgrade in 37 - 38

2010-05-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595677 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-05-27 04:04:43 EDT --- -42 (on rawhide) seems good for me.

[Bug 595677] Dependency issue with upgrade in 37 - 38

2010-05-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595677 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 595677] Dependency issue with upgrade in 37 - 38

2010-05-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595677 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-27 14:36:40 EDT ---

[Bug 595677] Dependency issue with upgrade in 37 - 38

2010-05-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595677 --- Comment #3 from Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com 2010-05-26 02:40:56 EDT --- Got the F14 fix, are you rebuilding for F13?

[Bug 595677] Dependency issue with upgrade in 37 - 38

2010-05-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595677 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-05-26 03:38:33 EDT --- With 37 - 41 (on rawhide):

[Bug 595677] Dependency issue with upgrade in 37 - 38

2010-05-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595677 --- Comment #7 from Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com 2010-05-26 04:48:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) With 37 - 41 (on

[Bug 595677] Dependency issue with upgrade in 37 - 38

2010-05-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595677 --- Comment #6 from Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com 2010-05-26 04:46:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) Yes, I am doing it.

[Bug 595677] Dependency issue with upgrade in 37 - 38

2010-05-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595677 --- Comment #8 from Peng Wu p...@redhat.com 2010-05-27 01:50:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) (In reply to comment #4)

[Bug 595677] Dependency issue with upgrade in 37 - 38

2010-05-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595677 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-05-25 07:23:07 EDT --- By the way currently EVR path from