[Bug 563399] abyssinica-fonts should be renamed to sil-abyssinica-fonts

2010-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563399 Mathieu Bridon changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 563399] abyssinica-fonts should be renamed to sil-abyssinica-fonts

2010-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563399 Bug 563399 depends on bug 563673, which changed state. Bug 563673 Summary: Review Request: sil-abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica

[Bug 563399] abyssinica-fonts should be renamed to sil-abyssinica-fonts

2010-02-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563399 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2010-02-11 01:16:39 EST --- Thanks for the fast response :) -- Configure bugmail: https://b

[Bug 563399] abyssinica-fonts should be renamed to sil-abyssinica-fonts

2010-02-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563399 Mathieu Bridon changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 563399] abyssinica-fonts should be renamed to sil-abyssinica-fonts

2010-02-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563399 --- Comment #2 from Mathieu Bridon 2010-02-10 08:20:28 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) > Sure it should. There was probably a

[Bug 563399] abyssinica-fonts should be renamed to sil-abyssinica-fonts

2010-02-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563399 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2010-02-10 05:54:23 EST --- Sure it should. There was probably a "adapt to F11 packaging gu