[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #33 from Peter Oliver --- Thanks for your help, everyone. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ fonts-bugs mailing list --

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System --- twitter-twemoji-fonts-2.4.0-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-86ff582bf9 -- You are receiving

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #31 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/twitter-twemoji-fonts. You may commit to the branch "f27" in about 10 minutes. -- You

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 Bug 1514274 depends on bug 1527289, which changed state. Bug 1527289 Summary: Review Request: nototools - Noto fonts support tools and scripts plus web site generation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1527289 What

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ---

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #29 from Peter Oliver --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #28) > @Peter, can we drop the whole Noto Emoji source requirement from this font > package now? It looks like the only file you use from it is a

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #28 from Neal Gompa --- @Peter, can we drop the whole Noto Emoji source requirement from this font package now? It looks like the only file you use from it is a single tmpl file. Can you instead submit a

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #27 from Neal Gompa --- (In reply to Peter Oliver from comment #26) > > If I understand correctly, what you're telling me is that I need to include > both URLs in a single comment, and that I have to label

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #26 from Peter Oliver --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #25) > But fedora-review will automatically use posts that have the following > construction: > > Spec URL: >

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #25 from Neal Gompa --- (In reply to Peter Oliver from comment #24) > (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #23) > > I need specifically links laid out specifically as they are in the > > original post, so that

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #24 from Peter Oliver --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #23) > I need specifically links laid out specifically as they are in the > original post, so that fedora-review can process it. Are you sure that

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #23 from Neal Gompa --- @Peter, I need specifically links laid out specifically as they are in the original post, so that fedora-review can process it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 Peter Oliver changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(ma...@mavit.org.u |

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ma...@mavit.org.uk

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #20 from Neal Gompa --- (In reply to Peter Oliver from comment #19) > So, can I confirm the status of this review? Are we waiting for nototools > to be split out into its own package? Is there anything else

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #19 from Peter Oliver --- So, can I confirm the status of this review? Are we waiting for nototools to be split out into its own package? Is there anything else blocking review? -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #18 from Peter Oliver --- This builds fine with the unbundled nototools. SRPM:

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1527289 Referenced

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #17 from Peng Wu --- It seems nototools can install scripts and data now. I will check if we can build noto-emoji with installed nototools. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #16 from Peng Wu --- I filed a package review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1527289 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #15 from Jeremy Bicha --- Should we open a separate bug to discuss nototools packaging? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #14 from Peter Oliver --- (In reply to Peng Wu from comment #13) > Okay, I am trying to package nototools separately. I started to look at this myself. I saw that there's a copy of fontcrunch bundled in

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #13 from Peng Wu --- Okay, I am trying to package nototools separately. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ fonts-bugs

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #12 from Neal Gompa --- (In reply to Peng Wu from comment #8) > (In reply to Jeremy Bicha from comment #7) > > Why don't you package nototools separately? You are using an embedded copy > > of nototools to

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #11 from Peter Oliver --- Thanks. I've updated the spec to use C.UTF-8, too. SRPM URL:

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #10 from Jeremy Bicha --- (In reply to Peng Wu from comment #8) > The problem is that nototools can't by installed when we package, > the upstream didn't tell when the tools can be installed. I don't think

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #9 from Peng Wu --- (In reply to Peter Oliver from comment #6) > Peng Wu: Do you please happen to remember why the spec file for > google-noto-emoji-fonts includes the following lines? > > > # Work around UTF-8 >

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #8 from Peng Wu --- (In reply to Jeremy Bicha from comment #7) > Why don't you package nototools separately? You are using an embedded copy > of nototools to build google-noto-emoji-fonts and emojitwo-fonts (in

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 Jeremy Bicha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbi...@ubuntu.com

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 Peter Oliver changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@redhat.com

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #5 from Neal Gompa --- (In reply to Peter Oliver from comment #4) > (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #3) > > General question: Why is Noto part of Twemoji? My understanding is that > > these are different

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #4 from Peter Oliver --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #3) > General question: Why is Noto part of Twemoji? My understanding is that > these are different fonts altogether? See

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa --- General question: Why is Noto part of Twemoji? My understanding is that these are different fonts altogether? And what's exactly going on with the metadata mutation going on in the prep

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #2 from Peter Oliver --- SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mavit/twitter-twemoji-fonts/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00685492-twitter-twemoji-fonts/twitter-twemoji-fonts-2.3.1-4.fc28.src.rpm --

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ngomp...@gmail.com

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 Peter Oliver changed: What|Removed |Added CC|